I don’t think the Jury is going to buy this bullshit. Almost all of it counters the evidence and witness testimony.
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/Pioneer Valley Arms February Giveaway ***Smith & Wesson SD9VE 9MM***
yeah, but it is not a UK, plus, it is just quite peculiar how they put it in the 'matter of the fact' way, pretending it is actually true.The UK has had this legal travesty for years
it only matters what we say now, not what we have said before. who controls the past - controls the future, and who controls the present - controls the past.At no point did Mr. Grosskruetz point his gun at Mr. Rittenhouse, except when he did as shown in the photo and as testified by Mr. Grosskruetz.
Grosskruetz testified under oath he pointed the gun at rittenhouse, binger lies and says he didn’t say that.
He should lose his law license
Well, the rifle is black, so we can’t do that!!!Remember the RIFLE killed two people that night.
So, charge the rifle with crimes.![]()
if you listen to that feed with commenting attorneys - what did they say?should be a mistrial right there
"Disarming" a commie. HahaSo that's the five then. Two homicides (Rosenbaum, Huber), two endangerments (McGuinness, JKM), and one disarming a commie (Byecep Boy).
You are correct,,,,They didn’t charge many rioters