Soundwave
NES Member
So with a CC license you can carry near a school? Even if he's not carrying concealed?
-
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
-
Be sure to enter the NES/Pioneer Valley Arms February Giveaway ***Smith & Wesson SD9VE 9MM***
17-year-old arrested in killing of 2 people in Kenosha
- Thread starter Toast
- Start date
A CC license to open carry a rifle?! f***ing ****** bullshit.
I’m guessing he was looking for “likes” for his Twitter account
The guy’s a monster… for how he routed the sling through the pc.
Who knows, maybe Wisconsin has a weird section of law that permits carrying a firearm near a school as long as you have a CC license.
Kinda like how you can’t carry on an ATV or snowmobile in NH unless you have a license.
bigbravehog
NES Member
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2013
- Messages
- 7,464
- Likes
- 20,528
bigbravehog
NES Member
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2013
- Messages
- 7,464
- Likes
- 20,528
Can we stop with the purse fighting?
DarthRevan
NES Member
I was enjoying the bullshit.
"They" want to be treated equal, while Bash away just like we all Bash each other, "they" don't deserve to be treated any differently.
Do you mean there is a verdict? or did you mean back, as in "the jury is back deliberating this morning"?
I have seen this reported nowhere else.
193rdsoldier
NES Member
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2010
- Messages
- 1,295
- Likes
- 1,376
Listening to livestream and they are saying there was a question from the jury. Not that they are back with a verdict.
Found the blog. The post is not the complete story and is misleading. There are 2 "methods" the software has to enhance images / videos. Algorithm based and AI based.
If the Algorithm based operations were used, then its fine as evidence. AI is only good for investigations.
PS: i would argue that the result of the enhancing in regaurds to this case, is fricking useless.
I heard the jury was coming back with a verdict, was a false alarm. Sorry.
pdm
NES Member
Jury wants to see some evidence. Defense is arguing their motion.
- Joined
- Nov 16, 2014
- Messages
- 30,608
- Likes
- 41,331
What lol
I think the judge should have been sequestered along with the jury. Why is he talking about what people outside the courtroom think or are writing?
Because it's a mistrial and a retirement in the same ruling.
the prosecution withheld a higher resolution video and we didn't find out about it until after final arguments
Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963)
Evidence that is exculpatory, such as out of court statements of other parties (Ziminskis), video footage, etc. is subject to automatic mandatory discovery.
This is what they are talking about when you hear the term "Brady Evidence". (also Rule 14 under Mass. Rules of Crim. Pro.)
Last edited:
I’m guessing that’s the video that they currently want to review again right? Can we see this video?
The prosecution gave 1/4th height 1/16th res version during discovery, excuse was 'we just uploaded it and accidentally compressed the shit out of it'
the lawyer in me would argue that its not clear which video was played during the trial
defense was playing the video and fat f*** messed up and said 'our video looks better' and that's what turned everyone onto it
You would think that the court system would have a way to validate digital evidence by now to ensure everyone has the same, unaltered content. MD5 hashes for example.
Like the pics of Jan 6th with the altered artwork in the capitol that made it into evidence?
For you smart computer people:
How much, would it matter, if the source/original video was a much lower resolution than the ADA used in the closing?
That the ADA used an AI/algorithim enhanced video and that is the HiDef video they gave to the Defense after closing statements. The HiDef is actually an altered video all along.
How much, would it matter, if the source/original video was a much lower resolution than the ADA used in the closing?
That the ADA used an AI/algorithim enhanced video and that is the HiDef video they gave to the Defense after closing statements. The HiDef is actually an altered video all along.
resolution = pixels. The more original, unaltered pixels - the better the image quality and the better the quality - the less blur will occur when you zoom in.
When an image is enhanced, pixels are beeing added and the colors of those pixels are "guessed". You can read here about AI vs Algorithm here:
Can AI Be Used for Forensics and Investigations?
In this article, Martino explains why AI may be acceptable for forensics and investigations if used within some boundaries and safeguards.
blog.ampedsoftware.com
Last edited:
I don’t think that’s the case. I believe the high res video is the actual uncompressed feed from the aircraft. Edit: it was security camera footage not aircraft surveillance video.
However, if someone used computer vision algorithms to increase the resolution, if you want to maintain the frame rate then the algorithm would need to use AI to essentially interpret the image and add data. That would be a no go for evidence.
If you don’t mind losing frames, then you can utilize a super-resolution algorithm to take a 1-n series of video frames, and then combine noisy data across the frames into one less noisy and higher res image. I wouldn’t have a problem with this algorithm being used to show say, a license plate. But it may be problematic for identifying a person’s face that is moving around. The algorithm works better with stationary objects.
The difference of resolution:
In God We Trust
NES Member
Dude, I’m not choosing sides in your slap fight, but can you stop shitting up the thread with it?
Similar threads
