“Here’s what I would say to anybody who any time they hear the word guns automatically goes off, like, ‘Oh, they’re going to repeal the Second Amendment,’” he said. “Let’s make a bet, you and me. Let’s say over the next five years — we’ll do a Google search, we’ll have an independent party monitor it — you keep track of how many good and constructive things are associated with athletes having a gun, and I’ll keep track of all the tragedies and criminality and folly. And let’s see who comes out ahead or behind as the case may be. These things are directly connected.”
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2014/04/03/b...gun-rights-supporters-to-a-bet/#ixzz2xyasrqGI
So what's his point? He wants to lose a bet? I don't get it. Even Handgun Control Inc, or Violence Policy Center, or whatever their name is today, says the "good-to-bad" ratio is probably 10,000:1.
I would imagine that "good and constructive things", e.g. self-defense for athletes with guns happens about the same ratio as non-athletes.
I'd take that bet.
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2014/04/03/b...gun-rights-supporters-to-a-bet/#ixzz2xyasrqGI
So what's his point? He wants to lose a bet? I don't get it. Even Handgun Control Inc, or Violence Policy Center, or whatever their name is today, says the "good-to-bad" ratio is probably 10,000:1.
I would imagine that "good and constructive things", e.g. self-defense for athletes with guns happens about the same ratio as non-athletes.
I'd take that bet.
