New Hampshire is crumbing for the top spot. Overdose Nation: Is Your State in the Top 10 for Overdose Deaths?
Let me know when someone OD's on pot and we can bring it into the debate.
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
New Hampshire is crumbing for the top spot. Overdose Nation: Is Your State in the Top 10 for Overdose Deaths?
Let me know when someone OD's on pot and we can bring it into the debate.
The post wasn’t about Pot it was about Heroine
Just making a point about New Hampshire. Didn’t realize we had strict rules on exactly what to post, oh that’s right we don’t.Thread title: >> Buying Legal Pot Will Get You On The Federal Database
Just making a point about New Hampshire. Didn’t realize we had strict rules on exactly what to post, oh that’s right we don’t.
Fatal "marijuana-related" automobile accident studies nearly always implicate poly-drug abuse as a key factor, a common thread in these deaths appears to be mixing alcohol with THC.A 42-year-old pipe-fitter told police she took sleep and pain medication Saturday night and then drank a beer and vaped a cannabis-type oil the next day before allegedly crashing her SUV into five pedestrians in Revere, killing a 5-year-old girl and leaving her 2-month-old sister with life-threatening injuries, prosecutors said Monday.
I'm still waiting to hear exactly what this "federal database" is, and how people will "get on" it for simply making a cash purchase at a "legal pot" shop. Loads of FUD, no substance.Thread title: >> Buying Legal Pot Will Get You On The Federal Database
Even the DEA is skeptical about the feasibility of dying from marijuana OD.Let me know when someone OD's on pot and we can bring it into the debate.
Hawaii becomes first state to put gun owners in databaseFatal "marijuana-related" automobile accident studies nearly always implicate poly-drug abuse as a key factor, a common thread in these deaths appears to be mixing alcohol with THC.
I'm still waiting to hear exactly what this "federal database" is, and how people will "get on" it for simply making a cash purchase at a "legal pot" shop. Loads of FUD, no substance.
Even the DEA is skeptical about the feasibility of dying from marijuana OD.
Fatal "marijuana-related" automobile accident studies nearly always implicate poly-drug abuse as a key factor, a common thread in these deaths appears to be mixing alcohol with THC.
I'm still waiting to hear exactly what this "federal database" is, and how people will "get on" it for simply making a cash purchase at a "legal pot" shop. Loads of FUD, no substance.
It also has a subscription, upstream, to a company. To scan ID's at a state level. To assume there isn't cohesion with big data and fedgov is...silly.
Does possession inherently make you a PP? The wording in (18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(3) is "user of", so was Bill "I never inhaled" Clinton a PP for admitting possession?In the same way that an IP address doesn't necessarily correlate to a person, a visit to a legal pot shop doesn't necessarily correlate to you buying there. I know some people who visited a pot shop in Oregon and they had to scan their IDs to go in, but didn't buy any. To think that those people are prohibited persons simply for visiting is...silly.
... your ID is only scanned upon entry, not purchase. The feds therefore cannot make you a PP because there is no proof that John Doe purchased an eighth of grandaddy kush, just that John Doe went to a place where that is sold.
My view exactly, if someone wants to smoke, fine. For me I don’t need something that makes me sleepy and hungry. I do that on my own
Does possession inherently make you a PP? The wording in (18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(3) is "user of", so was Bill "I never inhaled" Clinton a PP for admitting possession?
Seeds here in CA cost $200 for 4 individual seeds at the weed stores.Also sold are immature plants,I would imagine they are expensive.
Plants seem to run 15-40 each depending on what variety.
So far in CA, there is no tracking requirement for purchases from weed shops. I've asked every store when my friend has gone in to buy. They verify that your I.D. is legit, and you are of legal age, and that's it. I haven't even heard of this "1oz per day" thing that you guys mention on page 1 of this thread.
Under AUMA it is LEGAL for any adult 21 or over to:
(1) Possess, process, transport, purchase, obtain, or give away to persons 21 or older, not more than one ounce of cannabis or 8 grams of concentrated cannabis [HSC 11362.1(a)(1) and (2)].
(2) Cultivate, possess, plant, harvest, dry or process not more than six live plants and possess the produce of the plants [HSC 11362.1(a)(3)
PROVIDED:
(a) Any cannabis in excess of one ounce is stored in the person's private residential property, in a locked space, and not visible from a public place. HSC 11362.2
(b) No more than six plants are planted at any one residence at one time.
(c) Local governments may impose reasonable restrictions on cultivation, but may not forbid cultivation indoors in a residence or accessory structure that is fullly enclosed and secure. Locals are free to prohibit outdoor cultivation altogether until such time as adult use is made legal under federal law. (HSC 11362.2(b)).
Violation of restrictions on personal use cultivation is a $250 infraction for six plants or less [HSC 11362.4(e)].
The shop enters your name in their database,that is fact in CA.
Most people with nothing to fear just hand over their ID without question.
The verifying legal age is just to get in the door,before you can actually see what's for sale they take your ID again and enter it into their system,and that system is tied to another system (statewide I'm guessing) that tracks purchases so you cant buy over the daily amount,which is a lot.
Odd, they specifically said that no information is tracked, registered, or otherwise after the transaction is complete.
I will take some time to look into this and see if I can come back with a firm answer written in to the penal code or otherwise
The shop enters your name in their database,that is fact in CA.
Most people with nothing to fear just hand over their ID without question.
The verifying legal age is just to get in the door,before you can actually see what's for sale they take your ID again and enter it into their system,and that system is tied to another system (statewide I'm guessing) that tracks purchases so you cant buy over the daily amount,which is a lot.
26161.5.
(a) A licensee shall not disclose a consumer’s personal information to a third party, except to the extent necessary to allow responsibility for payment to be determined and payment to be made or if the consumer has consented to the licensee’s disclosure of the personal information. This section does not prohibit the disclosure of nonpublic personal information to the State of California or a city, county, or city and county to perform official duties pursuant to this division or a local ordinance.
26162.5.
(a) Identification cards issued pursuant to Section 11362.71 of the Health and Safety Code are hereby deemed “medical information” within the meaning of the Confidentiality of Medical Information Act (Part 2.6 (commencing with Section 56) of Division 1 of the Civil Code) and shall not be disclosed by a licensee except as (1) necessary for the State of California or any city, county, or city and county to perform official duties pursuant to this chapter, or a local ordinance, or (2) to a contractor providing software services to a licensee for the purpose of conducting a transaction or verifying eligibility, provided that the contractor does not use or retain medical information for any other purpose or share information with any party other than the contracting licensee.
I miss my Paraguat from the 80’s"Organic" is not necessarily safer with, perhaps, an exception to pesticides/fungicides. Which is where many of the safety concerns lay.
Pretty much any type of labeled pesticides are administratively banned by MA unless it is specifically approved for use on such crop by the feds. And, as you can imagine, the feds aren't looking to approve labeled use for a prohibited crop.
“Currently, EPA does not allow the use of a registered pesticide on marijuana or hemp,” according to a letter dated April 30 from Mr. Lebeaux, “Because of this, the use of pesticides on marijuana or hemp is prohibited in Massachusetts.”
It's probably a good thing but it would cause production costs to increase by a significant amount. You are now talking about highly controlled "clean room" environments and the use of beneficial predator insects. Whether an outright ban is a good thing is a matter of perspective. Add other regulatory costs, taxes, reduced production potential due to pests/disease, government uncertainty = expensive.
I’ll bet this time of year is the worst for you.
(The hibernation thing)
does that include alcohol?People are going to use whether it's legal or not. It's not for me; I don't need to alter reality with substances to deal with it, and I wouldn't want a shop in my neighborhood to add to crime. In the end, only weak people need drugs to feel normal.
Does possession inherently make you a PP? The wording in (18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(3) is "user of", so was Bill "I never inhaled" Clinton a PP for admitting possession?
Under AUMA it is LEGAL ... PROVIDED:
(a) Any cannabis in excess of one ounce is stored in the person's private residential property, in a locked space, and not visible from a public place. HSC 11362.2
(b) No more than six plants are planted at any one residence at one time.
(c) Local governments may impose reasonable restrictions on cultivation, but may not forbid cultivation indoors in a residence or accessory structure that is fullly enclosed and secure. Locals are free to prohibit outdoor cultivation altogether until such time as adult use is made legal under federal law. (HSC 11362.2(b)).
Just saw on Fox News that lawmakers want a change in the field sobriety tests for impairment other than alcohol....
If you are suspected of driving while impaired and a cop just thinks you are high it is being proposed that you have to submit to a saliva swab and blood test or risk losing your license...
So a new way for law enforcement to bolster their DNA database without a warrant and probable cause.
If I can find an article about it I will post it...
No, you are not getting my dna, period. If they try to push this I foresee a lot more dead cops on the side of the road than we already have. And I’m a law abiding citizen. Imagine how the criminal illegals will react to this.Just saw on Fox News that lawmakers want a change in the field sobriety tests for impairment other than alcohol....
If you are suspected of driving while impaired and a cop just thinks you are high it is being proposed that you have to submit to a saliva swab and blood test or risk losing your license...
So a new way for law enforcement to bolster their DNA database without a warrant and probable cause.
If I can find an article about it I will post it...
Just saw on Fox News that lawmakers want a change in the field sobriety tests for impairment other than alcohol....
If you are suspected of driving while impaired and a cop just thinks you are high it is being proposed that you have to submit to a saliva swab and blood test or risk losing your license...
So a new way for law enforcement to bolster their DNA database without a warrant and probable cause.
If I can find an article about it I will post it...