Yep, another data point they can use to justify getting rid of the paper forms entirely.
Well done!
As much as I loathe this system, isn't there a nexus point where using it can be better than the alternative, which is not doing the transfer? I mean if two guys run around all day trying to find paper, and they can't get it, do you want them to simply not transfer the gun? So there is sort of a line in the sand where "fighting the man" and "getting what you want" crosses paths. There is an obvious third way, too, but that pretty much implies that someone will be breaking the law.
Ironically enough I think some people have likely gone the third way, intentionally or otherwise, already, due to frustrations in terms of complying with this system. I was at an MA gun shop the other day, and ran into one guy who told me exactly that. The discussion of private transfers came up, and he said more or less "I sent one in, they rejected it.... I just took everything they sent back and threw it into the shredder. I already sent them the form once before, all filled out right... all easy to read. What is their problem with this??? Why the
**** should I have to do it over again, when I made a good faith effort to comply with the law!!!???" He was pretty pissed about the whole thing, and I can't say that I blame him for feeling that way.
Further it's been proven that Guida and company probably don't need to answer to anyone but U-haul.... so what makes you think that they will even need justification for not accepting paper anymore? As it stands now FRB/CJIS is basically making up policy on a whim to suit whatever its agenda is. My guess is that agenda consists of pissing off gun owners enough to make them behave as criminals, and getting dumbasses to report transfers under circumstances they are clearly not obligated to. (if you read the verbiage on the E-FA-10 instructions, it's pretty apparent they want people to register anything and everything, and report everything, despite the fact that the laws regarding reporting of transfers are very constrained and specific compared to these instructions. )
-Mike