If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Yes on all counts. I always got a kick out of his curbing on Rt. 4 well within the ROW of the road.Being a former police officer (I believe his father was as well), and wielding considerable clout on the town boards (think he was a selectman as well at some point), John Harrington did have quite the influence on limiting the number of liquor licenses issued.
I remember when Harrington's was between Purity Supreme (now sort of Andiamo) and Marshalls (now a gym?). He was squeezed out of that space- that's when he built the current location behind those buildings (now Lincoln Liquors).
I had acquaintances with first-hand knowledge of goings-on back then. As I remember it, when he built his free-standing building, the parking lot was designed to connect to the loading docks lot (rear of) the Purity/ Marshall's building, then had some town rule or by-law changed to prevent trucks from backing up from Summer Street into the loading spaces. He then charged Marshall's and Purity to use his parking lot to back trucks in.
Liquor licenses generate revenue. The more licenses the more money for the city and state.Governor Healy just passed a bill to add 250 liquor licenses in the city of Boston over the next 3 years. Really? And she is worried about lawful gun owners?
DITTOJokes on her - i don't drink, so I can spend more money on guns.
While liquor licenses were started in the 19th century, AFAIK the cap system came into being after the repeal of Prohibition. Nor was Boston alone in implementing such caps at that time.The cap on liquor licenses was started in the 19th century when the Brahmins who ran the state legislature wanted to suppress the Irish immigrants who were flooding into Boston.
Maybe MA should have a limit on drinks.how many drunk driving deaths will result from that many more liquor licensees?
How many does it take to affect change? it's for the kids....
Perhaps - if they were able to even be approved to get a license for such.If the risk was worth the reward, they would already have alcohol in businesses there.
If the projected tax revenue generated more money than the police/emt cost, they would have already been approved for a license.Perhaps - if they were able to even be approved to get a license for such.
That would be true if it was a free market, but it's not. The limited number of licenses creates a barrier to entry, which in turn creates monopoly power. So the licenses go to the locations with the highest risk adjusted rate of return, excluding less profitable (but still viable) businesses.If the risk was worth the reward, they would already have alcohol in businesses there.
Liquor licenses, casino licenses, more crime, more DUIs, more substance abuse, more homelessness, but f*** you if you attempt to defend yourself from the inevitable increase of violent crime that comes with it. Democrats are destroying this country.Governor Healy just passed a bill to add 250 liquor licenses in the city of Boston over the next 3 years. Really? And she is worried about lawful gun owners?
That's their whole objective and has been for decades. We are one election away from disappearing from the bottom of the toilet bowl. If the democrats steal this election, people had better be prepared for war.Liquor licenses, casino licenses, more crime, more DUIs, more substance abuse, more homelessness, but f*** you if you attempt to defend yourself from the inevitable increase of violent crime that comes with it. Democrats are destroying this country.
Wake me up when CW 2.0 starts. I’ll bring the coffee and donuts.That's their whole objective and has been for decades. We are on election away from disappearing from the bottom of the toilet bowl. If the democrats steal this election, people had better be prepared for war.
Maybe the smaller stores should find a business model that works for them. Like beer and wine from smaller/local producers, etc. Walmart will probably have the more generic brands. Just one idea. I believe that competition benefits me as a consumer.Wait unitl your local Walmart has a liquor license and puts the 3 packie's in town out of biz. THEN you'll hear about it. LOL
After WM and MB and a few other HUGE players have their lic's, they can go back to 12 or 9 or 3 in a specific city or town b/c no one is using them.