MA Gun Grab 2024: H.4885 - Passed legislature, headed to the governor

Status
Not open for further replies.
Nothing left for dealers to sell online as we cannot import LCFD or AWs. So guns that other states want, we cannot bring into the state.

As written distributors/wholesalers in MA are out of business. Anyone who is in business to gunbrokering stuff or otherwise selling online is also toast.

Massive hit to all dealers in that they have to register the guns to their business within 7 days of guns arriving. So no guns will be in the state anywhere that the state is unaware of (yes, that is tongue in cheek because we all know that the people committing crimes will pay no attention to this)
So there's additional state reporting BS for dealers on this bill, too? Bastards.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pdm
I believe it is done by mail at a charge to the LTC holder of $25.
Wait, you have to pay $25 to see what they are illegally keeping track of in a database?

From:
, we get:

18 U.S. Code § 926 - Rules and regulations​


The Act also forbade the U.S. Government agency from keeping a registry directly linking non-National Firearms Act firearms to their owners, the specific language of this law (Federal Law 18 U.S.C. 926) being:
No such rule or regulation prescribed [by the Attorney General] after the date of the enactment of the Firearms Owners Protection Act may require that records required to be maintained under this chapter or any portion of the contents of such records, be recorded at or transferred to a facility owned, managed, or controlled by the United States or any State or any political subdivision thereof, nor that any system of registration of firearms, firearms owners, or firearms transactions or disposition be established. Nothing in this section expands or restricts the Secretary's authority to inquire into the disposition of any firearm in the course of a criminal investigation.
There it is.


Nevertheless, at one point the ATF's National Tracing Center (NTC) contained hundreds of millions of firearm tracing and registration records, and consisted of several databases; but as of May 2016, many of these databases have been deleted to fall inline with record deletion requirements, per the Government Accountability Office (GAO).[17]
Wow. So, should the whole thing that they are proposing also be deleted from these bills, to "fall inline with record deletion requirements"? The Mass legislature and senate don't want to be breaking the law with their new proposals.
 
Last edited:
That was my first thought. Evil features galore pre 8/1, right?
Well the alternative is they have five weird piles of shit that will be even more confusing and unenforceable. I mean we're literally at the point of 150% clown world levels if this passes without a total grandfather. "Oh that rifle is post ban, post healey but its pre 8/1/zanzibar! " nobody's going to keep track of that shit especially if the law doesn't destroy or null out some of the old garbage in the process.
 
I don't know who or where, but somewhere in this thread, I thought I read that they were not allowed to change the language of this(these) bill(s). It had to take and use only the language in either the house and/or senate version.

Anybody else remember seeing or saying this?
 
There was a line about making 3d printers that advertise as making guns illegal. I didnt see anything about injection molds though?
 
I don't know who or where, but somewhere in this thread, I thought I read that they were not allowed to change the language of this(these) bill(s). It had to take and use only the language in either the house and/or senate version.

Anybody else remember seeing or saying this?
I remember saying that, but I was parroting what I thought I had read before and it doesn’t appear correct.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom