Your comments about open carry is OPINION and that is what I was referring to. I was also pointing out the 2nd does not give you the right to carry concealed. Just because you WANT to carry concealed does not mean you have the RIGHT to do so. Understand?
No rights are bestowed by the Bill of Rights. This includes, by association, the Second Amendment. They're self-evident. I never said that the Second Amendment *gives* any right. I hope that you, as a gun owner, concur.
Any peaceable person ought to be able to carry as they see fit. Therefore, this implies that they
ought to be allowed to carry openly or via concealment. Of course I concur that 2A is predicated on the notion of peaceable carry by any non-violent, sane person, unconnected with military duty.
It's quite disconcerting if you take issue with this. If you value your right of self-preservation, it's probably worth taking an introspective analysis on your value system.
Since you believe democracy is such a fallacy you may be better of off in a country that better meets your needs. Yes democracy means that majority rules, so that would mean more that 50%. Good that you understand that. What system of government would you prefer? You sure do a fair amount of complaining about a system you don't participate in. How do you expect anything to get better if you expand all your effort bitching online rather than doing something about the things you bitch about?
Cool! We have a regular Hamiltonian here don't we? I thought you guys died off with the Whig party!
Yes. Democracy is fallacy. Democracy says this: "If we can get 50% of the vote
plus one then we can make a law that usurps your rights." Applied in context, it might provide some insight on my observation of "fallacy":
In a purely hypothetical example: If 50% of New Hampshire voters
plus one voted for the creation of an income tax, that would be acceptable, per democratic logic. New Hampshire now
requires that you surrender 10% of your wages. Punishment for not sending payment includes nasty, threatening letters from Concord at first, followed by a knock at the door by some spiffy men in blue uniforms with Sig Sauer pistols on their hips and a pretty piece of silver jewlery on their chests from the government. If you continue to object to having your money stolen, they're going to incarcerate you, and maybe at the barrel of one of their Sigs. Get the picture? This is democracy at work, right?
I contend that another form of government would be a better safeguard against popular tyranny, namely something like a minimalist republic. Of course, YMMV.
Oh, here comes the predictable "stop-your-bitching" dismissal. And it appears that you have some insight on my personal life on what causes I champion when I'm not working. Care to share?
Calling NH "New Massachusetts" couldn't be further from the truth. Clearly you know very little about how NH operates.
Care to enlighten the ignorant?
So? What was the cost difference for the license? Would you pay the premium in order to obtain your NH license faster? Other than the $20 you spent for your NH non-res license, please tell me what other fees, taxes etc. you, as a non-resident, have contributed to the state of NH?
In purely nominal terms it was $80 ($100 minus $20), IIRC. In real terms (sans inflation or any discounting) it was $16.67 a year for Massachusetts and $5 a year for New Hampshire. Other taxes may have included an indeterminable amount of gasoline tax and quite possibly cigarette tax (I didn't buy them for me, I swear.) I contribute regularly to the New Hampshire economy by electing to purchase merchandise from New Hampshire-based merchants (from a consumption perspective). Why this is relevant is lost on me though.
Pretty sure I already answered this. There is nothing in the 2nd that says you have the right to carry CONCEALED. By allowing you to open carry the state on NH is NOT violating your 2nd Amendment rights. Whether you agree or not.
Right. The word "concealed" never appears in the text of the Second Amendment. But it doesn't say "open" either. So who's to say? There's little case law on 2A, and the only meaningful jurisprudence is
Miller and
Heller. Neither of which discussed or provided relief for concealed or open carry.
Please tell me how NH is violating your right to self defense? I still fail to see how you have a damn thing to bitch about in regards to NH gun laws.
Nevermind that. Here's a far more interesting question: Why is the word "bitch" so prevalent in your posts? Is it just more widely used in the Granite State or something?
Yes you were pissed off because you had to wait a whole month for your NH non-res license. Boo hoo, poor you. It took longer than you wanted it to, yet I'm quite certain you contribute very little in fees and taxes to the state of NH. Perhaps MA residents should pay $400 for their non-resident license, or maybe a sales tax only to MA residents. We could then afford to pay the administrative costs for someone to process your non-resident license faster.
Not really. I wasn't "pissed" about that. I just made a casual observation:
Looks like they just deposited the $20 check... I mailed it on Friday, September 9. Nothing in the mail yesterday, so I guess I'll either expect an envelope from Concord either today (Wed., October 8) or tomorrow (Thursday, October 9).
Four weeks.
Where's the post to support your claim?
And why does my contribution of fees and taxes even relevant? So people who are victimized by institutionalized theft via tax more deserving in your opinion? $400 is grossly inappropriate too. The actual cost of a Massachusetts, resident license is
one order of magnitude less. I think you're grasping at straws here.
There are quite a few discrepancies in the MA resident vs. non-resident license as well. It took you three weeks to obtain a resident license. It took me three months to obtain a MA non-res LTC. Oh and mine is $100 annually vs. what is it 5 years for your resident LTC?
I don't see the point. But to dutifully answer your inquiry, it's $100 (5 to 6 year license). You're clearly grasping at straws.
I feel that NH gun laws are damn close to perfect. You are in the minority by complaining about them. If you love VT so much feel free to move there. Is someone physically keeping you in MA? Oh here is preview for what you can expect in the state you feel is so so great.
I'm not complaining. Again, I made a casual observation when some errant I-love-everything-about-New-Hampshire poster started some campaign of character assassination. Vermont is certainly on my list. And so is New Hampshire considering I'm a Free Stater. What's your bone to pick with not forcing people to say the word "God"? Or is this just another not-so-clever strawman from you? People shouldn't be forced into pledging any allegiance. They should do so on free will, that's acceptable.
I pledge my allegiance to the republic, not necessarily to the flag, of the United States of America. Yes, we are one nation, plagued by the same, bankrupt, statist regime of one tyrannical government, and we ought to be freely able to divide from said union, and liberty and justice for all.
OK, enough side tracking.
Something stinks around here and it isn't the gun laws in NH.
Strawman, I guess we're going to have to start a "Your mama is so..." thread now, huh?
Many of those states are considered to be "gun friendly"
Fine, Strawman.
Your welcome. It may have been taken out of context, but still aptly applies.
Whatever you say, strawman.