If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS June Giveaway ***Keltec SUB2000***
Please. No one is going to prison in Albuquerque for carrying a firearm, whether they are alone or with a few hundred others.
At the end of the video some did. She admitted this would do nothing to stop the violence
Actually most states recognize the high sheriff. Massachusetts does, but the high sheriff of this commonwealth; choses to be more of a politician than a law enforcement official. I see you ;likely got that info from google. However while in the academy (long ago); we studied the actual law. Yes it is likely an old law; but it's still on the books. Unfortunately most politicians and top law enforcement officials no longer follow the laws as they were written.
sourcenm.com
Here’s her answer on possible penalties: she has no idea.
No clear penalty for violating N.M. public health order on guns • Source New Mexico
The New Mexico government on Friday enacted a public health order prohibiting people from possessing firearms, but could not say what penalties people will face for violating the new directive.
In light of the expanding political attacks on 2-A one begins to wonder if instead of trying to express our concerns to the powers that be in a measured tone of voice perhaps we would be better served by addressing the situation in the same manner as the politicians do when we question their intent on violating our Constitutional civil rights..........and say to them in no uncertain terms:
What else can one say other than, power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely.This is terrible, we must do something!
This is something.
Therefore we will do this, even though it’s obviously unconstitutional:
New Mexico governor issues order suspending the right to carry firearms in public across Albuquerque
New Mexico Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham has issued an emergency public health order temporarily suspending the right to carry firearms in public across Albuquerque and surrounding Bernalillo County.apnews.com
(Apologies if this is a dupe)
Really? Care to tell me who the High Sheriff of Massachusetts is? Or some other states, perhaps? Perhaps a state charter or statute? Plymouth County has a High Sheriff, true, but I see no special powers which would allow him to arrest Healey.
Interesting, Elon Musk and I are close in age and immigrated to America at about the same age.
That's awesome ! What a f***ing whining bitch. She real has no clue, not one.
The Executive can issue an edict, but if it is unconstitutional the authorities have no duty to enforce it, in fact they have a duty to NOT enforce it.
You are correct, it would be an event that is infiltrated and used as a false flag.
“…She said she doesn’t think the Albuquerque Police Department could enforce the order, but the New Mexico State Police could do so because they’re required to carry out executive orders.Here’s her answer on possible penalties: she has no idea.
No clear penalty for violating N.M. public health order on guns • Source New Mexico
The New Mexico government on Friday enacted a public health order prohibiting people from possessing firearms, but could not say what penalties people will face for violating the new directive.
Don't forget that back in '21 this same governor repealed Immunity:
HB4 defines "public body" as a state or local government, an advisory board, a commission, an agency or an entity created by the constitution of New Mexico or any branch of government that receives public funding, including political subdivisions, special tax districts, school districts and institutions of higher education. and adds a new claim of violation of state constitutional rights, specifically "a public body or person acting on behalf of, under color of or within the course and scope of the authority of a public body shall not subject or cause to be subjected any resident of New Mexico or person within the state to deprivation of any rights, privileges or immunities secured pursuant to the constitution of New Mexico" while removing QI "In any claim for damages or relief under the New Mexico Civil Rights Act, no public body or person acting on behalf of, under color of or within the course and scope of the authority of a public body shall enjoy the defense of qualified immunity for causing the deprivation of any rights, privileges or immunities secured by the constitution of New Mexico." as well as sovereign immunity "The state shall not have sovereign immunity for itself or any public body within the state for claims brought pursuant to the New Mexico Civil Rights Act, and the public body or person acting on behalf of, under color of or within the course and scope of the authority of the public body provided pursuant to that act shall not assert sovereign immunity as a defense or bar to an action."
She's Warrening doubling down
