No More Rifles in Califorina

[DukeNukem]

Cali releases 10,000 prisoners while taking away gun rights.....what could go wrong.

 

[ntomsw]

Coming to Massachusetts, very very soon.

 

[DBLOCK020]

So do they have to sell em out of state, turn em in, or destroy em? Or is there a gf clause?

From the article "People who already own such weapons would be required to register them."
so I guess yea they will get g/f in...

 

[atilla]

Coming to Massachusetts, very very soon.

<-- coming to not tom's backyard in a tent, soon.

 

[FrugalFannie]

This is the perfect time for all manufacturers to cease all sales and service of AR's to any government entity [STRIKE=undefined]in California[/STRIKE].

FIFY

 

[Al-Jim19]

Coming to Massachusetts, very very soon.

Lalalalala please stop lalalalala

 

[WatchCityCPA]

But the .50 DTC is perfectly legal...

For now.

 

[Golddiggie]

They need to ban possession of Dihydrogen oxide next.

It's for the children after all.

 

[soloman02]

That state never ceases to amaze. I can see California from my front door. It's like living in the shadow of Mordor.

OH man that is Epic.
I'm quoting it in my sig.

 

[Dadstoys]

Can't we just move the Mexican border up a bit and fence the freaking state off from the rest of us?
Really , Mexico is welcome to it.
Problem is, they probably will be begging us to take it back in a year.
It'll drag thier standard of living down quickly.

 

[mikeyp]

Calm down people. Kali is just another place like N Korea, UK and China. The difference is that it could go bankrupt, and then hopefully those public servants lose their jobs.

I thought they already went bankrupt?

 

[jasons]

I thought they already went bankrupt?

Too big to fail.

 

[mikeyp]

Too big to fail.

Oh yeah, Detroit went bankrupt, I'm sure Cali's not far behind though

 

[Come and take]

What's funny is I work A LOT in that state, and everyone I talk to there owns or shoots...so I'm amazed that this passes...granted my sample set is pretty small. It's just people that either work for my company, or people that work at the hospitals that I'm working. But I always make it a point to visit gun shops around where I'm working when I go somewhere...and the ones in CA are always busy.

You see the same here in Mass. A lot are Fudds who don't give two s*hits about gun laws or their rights.

 

[Dench]

This is probably good news long term. Didn't SCOTUS say you cant ban common use firearms? Banning most of the rifle market that takes mags sounds like banning common use firearms to me.

Looks like a sexy supreme court ruling to me.

 

[Zappa]

This article itself is full of FAIL, but as I've said many times before, when it comes to the subject of guns, the ignorant media NEVER gets it right.

California, which has some of the toughest gun control laws in the nation, already bans rifles with large-capacity fixed magazines, which cannot be removed. This bill would expand that ban to add rifles that accept large-capacity removable magazines.

Really ????
So that means all .22 rifles with 15 round tube magazines are already banned ?????

Other bills in the package passed by the Senate would have tightened additional laws, including banning a type of trigger known as a button.

A "Button" Trigger ?????

Wrong again.

 

[exo]

A "Button" Trigger ?????

Wrong again.

Maybe they were looking at their kids' Xbox controller for comparison. It's probably as close as this "journalist" has ever gotten to a "gun".

 

[ntomsw]

I don't feel bad for these people at all. No one should.

They should get screwed as much as possible. They welcome these things with open arms.

 

[Rivers of Blood]

 

[Tekito]

I still own property in CA.

 

[noddaduma]

I still own property in CA.

I still have friends in California who don't give a single shit what Sacramento says about guns...and never will.

 

[stinx]

This is the perfect time for all manufacturers to cease all sales and service of AR's to any government entity in California.

Wishful thinking, but dead on.

 

[Skeeter]

I dont think it has passed.. at least yet.

This. While it probably will be law, it has not been signed yet.

 

[Livefreeormass]

I still own property in CA.

Your building's safer! It'd sport 10 bullet holes instead of 10x30. jk

 

[StevensMarksman]

Not only that but a majority of ppl there are like zombies, brain dead....

[video=youtube_share;SpHOaW99ST4]http://youtu.be/SpHOaW99ST4[/video]

[video=youtube_share;jrCbHYggdfY]http://youtu.be/jrCbHYggdfY[/video]

Thank god it is not that easy to repeal any part of the Bill of Rights. I like how that guy points out how stupid the sheeple really are.

StevensMarksman

 

[Glockster30]

From the article "People who already own such weapons would be required to register them."
so I guess yea they will get g/f in...

...and after registering their rifles, what's the next step in the slippery slope (that the anti-gun crowd has been telling us for years doesn't exist)?

 

[Pilgrim]

but no one is trying to take way your guns !

 

[Mr Weebles]

This is probably good news long term. Didn't SCOTUS say you cant ban common use firearms? Banning most of the rifle market that takes mags sounds like banning common use firearms to me.

Looks like a sexy supreme court ruling to me.

Agreed, but it unfortunately takes years for cases to hit the SCOTUS, if they ever do.

 

[xero2099]

back to dueling pistols soon

 

[Parker Duofold]

...and after registering their rifles...

"Rifles. What rifles?"