The ABC affiliate in Raleigh did not make any mention of gun rights, etc. in their recent report - the reporter on the scene is a VT alum. There is a local community news site and the gun debate is raging on.
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS June Giveaway ***Keltec SUB2000***
I didn't realize the federal GFSZ had been reenacted after the Supreme Court decided U.S. v. Lopez. But from what you're saying, having a CCW negates this law? Are you sure? I'm pretty sure my college (a state institution) forbids the carrying of firearms, period.GFSZ does exist but is a nullity for anyone with a CCW/LTC etc.
I think the MA anti-school laws are their own bundles of crap and has
nothing to do with GFSZ at all.
-Mike
Thank you FOX news... They are the only media outlet that has mentioned the fact that the school took the rights of the students and faculty to legally carry concealed firearms on campus. And that this could have been prevented if someone had a weapon other than the
killer.
1. The GFSZ zone law was indeed re-enacted but congress added a "we reallymean it" clause (something like "whereas guns impact interstate commerce...). The re-enacted version has been the subject of a SCOTUS decision.I didn't realize the federal GFSZ had been reenacted after the Supreme Court decided U.S. v. Lopez. But from what you're saying, having a CCW negates this law? Are you sure? I'm pretty sure my college (a state institution) forbids the carrying of firearms, period.
I am surprised they would get away with bringing the Commerce Clause up at all..!1. The GFSZ zone law was indeed re-enacted but congress added a "we reallymean it" clause (something like "whereas guns impact interstate commerce...). The re-enacted version has been the subject of a SCOTUS decision.
Seeing as I'm not in Mass., should I check Maine CCW laws to see if it mentions overriding the GSFZ act, or do all CCW licensing laws do it by default?2. The GFSZ law states that it is not a federal offense to possess or carry a gun in a SZ is you have a permit from the state that permits you to do this. It does not have anything to do with overriging state law.
3. MGL prohibits carry on one's person (MGL 269-10j) which is a subset of the more general definition of carry used elsewhere in MGL 269.
I am surprised they would get away with bringing the Commerce Clause up at all..!
Seeing as I'm not in Mass., should I check Maine CCW laws to see if it mentions overriding the GSFZ act, or do all CCW licensing laws do it by default?
I didn't realize the federal GFSZ had been reenacted after the Supreme Court decided U.S. v. Lopez. But from what you're saying, having a CCW negates this law? Are you sure? I'm pretty sure my college (a state institution) forbids the carrying of firearms, period.
Not that I don't believe you, but where can I verify that a CCW overrides the GFSZ? Is there any legal precedent that you can think of?GFSZ is overridden by the mere presence of a state issued permit/license. You have to see if Maine law prohibits CCW
in a school... if it does, you're still screwed, regardless of the GFSZ exception.
GFSZ is mostly feel good window dressing anyways... all it really is used for as
a tool to harass gun shop owners who happen to be within (1000 foot?)
radius of a school or some such. That's about the only time you ever hear it
come up.
I'll try looking up the Maine laws today... I'm not too sure what I'll find.Chances are if you are going to get "screwed" for carrying on a college campus it will NEVER be via GFSZ, but some state law. I guess what I'm getting at is GFSZ is irrelevant if you have a CCW... but this doesn't entitle you to break whatever state laws may (and probably do) exist.
Of course then theres the non-judicial punishment, eg, getting kicked
out of school or whatnot.
"As for the gun or guns used, where did they come from and what kind of weapon were they? Not sporting arms, it would seem, but highly efficient killing weapons that should probably be in the hands only of law enforcement or military personnel in combat."
http://www.boston.com/news/globe/ed...ls/articles/2007/04/16/at_a_loss_in_virginia/
Not that I would expect anything different from the globe.
My heart goes out to the families and friends of the victims. So very, very sad. I don't know what goes thru the minds of such evil, heartless people to do such things... I'm just dumbfounded.
Here's basically 2 reactions to addressing this problem I see going forward:
1) Allow all law abiding citizens to always arm and protect themselves
or
2) Ban all guns from humanity
I don't think anyone would agree that you can do #2 completely. But unfortunately I suspect that most people and politicians won't go for #1.
It never ceases to amaze me as to why in God's name ANYONE thinks that by making it illegal for law abiding citizens to carry in a school that bad guys will listen too.... defies logic completely.
I'm sorry for your loss.i went to highschool with one of the kids who was shot and killed