pastera
NES Member
I don't disagree with your last statement. I do hope the whole thing gets ruled as unconstitutional.
However... the states and subdivisions is referring back to facilities. That is, the records can not be transferred to any facility owned by the federal government or any state or political subdivision.
It says managed or controlled by.I don't disagree with your last statement. I do hope the whole thing gets ruled as unconstitutional.
However... the states and subdivisions is referring back to facilities. That is, the records can not be transferred to any facility owned by the federal government or any state or political subdivision.
That's not referring to location of data.
Why do you think the ATF tries to maintain that they don't have a searchable database of collected 4473s - that way they can say that they neither manage or control the data that is archived by a third party private contractor.
It's bullshit, we know it, they know it and they know that getting it to SCOTUS is low priority given all of the other higher priority shit like extreme risk orders, pistol braces, and forced reset triggers.