Sig isn't the greatest example because they've been fags wrt shipping/MA cooties stuff long before any of this came about.Do have a sample list yet? I think I saw Sig was not shipping MCX uppers to Ma.
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/Pioneer Valley Arms February Giveaway ***Smith & Wesson SD9VE 9MM***
Sig isn't the greatest example because they've been fags wrt shipping/MA cooties stuff long before any of this came about.Do have a sample list yet? I think I saw Sig was not shipping MCX uppers to Ma.
Glad I got a very large list of those who ship any and everything to Ma.Sig isn't the greatest example because they've been fags wrt shipping/MA cooties stuff long before any of this came about.
Putting aside for the moment that the law is unenforceable, that the structure to do so does not exist, and even that it will be thrown out when the SCOTUS get a say on it. What does the law actually say?It thrashes and cries about it but ultimately does nothing.... because there's no way to contol uncontrolled parts and the laws provide no structural pieces to do so. In short it's one of many full on running jokes in this pile of shit law.
The bolded portion is the critical language.369 “Unfinished frame or receiver”, a forging, casting, printing, extrusion, machined body or similar item that:
(i) has reached a stage in manufacture when it may readily be completed or assembled to function as a frame or receiver; orprovided, however, that “unfinished frame or receiver” shall not include a component designed and intended for use in an antique firearm.
(ii) is marketed or sold to the public to become or be used as the frame or receiver of a functional firearm once completed or assembled;
NES is the ONLY place I have heard this, so far.
agree with what you say, just not sure what post this is in response toLet's be careful not to read into the law what is clearly not in it.
Uppers remain completely unregulated.
The bolded portion is the critical language.
Why? Because in (i) the "readily converted" terminology is covered in existing case law - and the 80% parts sold objectively pass the ATF's standard.
So a new line of paperweight that requires some extra work wouldn't be marketed nor would it be readily convertable.
This is the real problem re: uppers and other assorted parts. Suppliers will look at our insane new law and decide that Massachusetts anything is not worth the risk. It's already happening and it's going to happen more as time goes on. They see our politicians are fanatic and nuts. Those folks who have a large list of suppliers still willing to ship to MA had better keep it updated 'cause I'll bet more than a few changes are forthcoming.No - many suppliers will stop shipping to Mass but that's their own prerogative.
This is the letter that went out from Ballard last weekend.
View: https://www.reddit.com/r/massachusetts/comments/1ewdowb/heavy_truck_dealer_states_they_will_not_be_able/#lightbox
Plenty of "can we still buy this?" questions.agree with what you say, just not sure what post this is in response to
I prefer the BRN-180 uppers
I think they ship to MA, if not, from their FAQ
Do they still need to have a non-flash-hider muzzle device, or just plain end with no device or threads?Let's be careful not to read into the law what is clearly not in it.
Uppers remain completely unregulated.
This is the letter that went out from Ballard last weekend.
View: https://www.reddit.com/r/massachusetts/comments/1ewdowb/heavy_truck_dealer_states_they_will_not_be_able/#lightbox
Well, they can do that. Or they can not do that, like Target Sports is doing. Like residents of Mass., they need to either fight it because it will migrate to other states, or just ignore it and fight it elsewhere. There WILL need to be a fight at some point.This is the real problem re: uppers and other assorted parts. Suppliers will look at our insane new law and decide that Massachusetts anything is not worth the risk. It's already happening and it's going to happen more as time goes on. They see our politicians are fanatic and nuts. Those folks who have a large list of suppliers still willing to ship to MA had better keep it updated 'cause I'll bet more than a few changes are forthcoming.![]()
What? Have not heard this anywhere else, either. Someone needs to start a new thread on this in the off topic area.This is not entirely new Jeep is no longer supplying any gas or diesel Jeep vehicles to Jeep dealers in Massachusetts because Massachusetts signed onto the California CARB Act. They are only allocating electric or hybred vehicles to Massachusetts dealers.
What do you mean by "standard mag"? Does the state call these that?Plenty of "can we still buy this?" questions.
The big issues are long guns on the roster, no standard mag carry and expansion of red flags.
I'm guessing that does not mean the "Snopes" that verifies if something is true or not.The ASF stuff will be before SCOTUS with Snopes, or it will be time to crack the four box open.
CZ P10CYa that's why I asked for people's input. I was just looking for a cheap 9mm because I spent 2800 on the spear. I just want to have a handgun to without spending another 500-1000.
The new law drops the types of devices and only considers an actual threaded muzzle as a feature.Do they still need to have a non-flash-hider muzzle device, or just plain end with no device or threads?
If it is registered then it is effected.I wonder if this affect fire trucks, ambulances, etc., or if there is an exemption.
State calls them "Large Capacity Feeding Devices" - however they are the standard magazines supplied with most semiautomatic guns.What do you mean by "standard mag"? Does the state call these that?
Bianchi moved out of Maryland so is no longer part of the case - Snopes is the new plaintiff.I'm guessing that does not mean the "Snopes" that verifies if something is true or not.
Let's be honest though nobody (in that userbase) is changing that barrel out, ever.BRN-180 does not have user replaceable barrels.
Let's be careful not to read into the law what is clearly not in it.
Uppers remain completely unregulated.
The bolded portion is the critical language.
Why? Because in (i) the "readily converted" terminology is covered in existing case law - and the 80% parts sold objectively pass the ATF's standard.
So a new line of paperweight that requires some extra work wouldn't be marketed nor would it be readily convertable.
Wondering if it would be better to wait until 10/23 or buy something before. Would just have to have whatever they put on the end welded, and that is it? Makes things easier.The new law drops the types of devices and only considers an actual threaded muzzle as a feature.
So you can have a permanently installed (pin/weld, silver solder, perimeter weld) device of your choice
So, does this mean greater than 10 rounds then?State calls them "Large Capacity Feeding Devices" - however they are the standard magazines supplied with most semiautomatic guns.
The ASF stuff will be before SCOTUS with Snopes, or it will be time to crack the four box open.
Wondering if it would be better to wait until 10/23 or buy something before. Would just have to have whatever they put on the end welded, and that is it? Makes things easier.
So, does this mean greater than 10 rounds then?
A lot of us, myself included, were reading it from a doomsday perspective.I thought the language was more vague, at one point there was a bunch of noise in there about parts or some bullshit but maybe that was in one of the draft bills. Not that it matters anyways.
So given no redefinition in Mass law, we would revert to the existing interpretation.(3)The term “firearm” means (A) any weapon (including a starter gun) which will or is designed to or may readily be convertedto expel a projectile by the action of an explosive; (B) the frame or receiver of any such weapon;
Point taken - I'm not going back and editing but will try to override habit and spellcheckDon't do that, it is Snope, and I already have a hard time not thinking of the leftist "fact checker" website every time I see the title of the suit.
![]()
Actually there is a silver lining to that cloud and that is if the case becomes prominent then whoever that guy is will automatically become more important than them....Don't do that, it is Snope, and I already have a hard time not thinking of the leftist "fact checker" website every time I see the title of the suit.
![]()
Your user name is problematic.I can’t speak for the Taurus, but you’re going to LOVE that Spear. I got mine right under the wire too and I have no regrets.
Anything that was on the shelf or in inventory on 8/1 is exempt so why bother waitingWondering if it would be better to wait until 10/23 or buy something before. Would just have to have whatever they put on the end welded, and that is it? Makes things easier.
No idea - a pin and weld is less likely to overheat the barrel and easier to reverse with minimal damageSecondary question, do these guys still do welding on guns?
Micro Arc Welding, Inc. – Micro Dimensional Welding (formerly Pullman Arms)
Yes, how many semiautomatics are shipped with magazines 10 rounds and under unless that particular model is purposely neutered for a ban state.So, does this mean greater than 10 rounds then?
What do you mean by "standard mag"? Does the state call these that?Plenty of "can we still buy this?" questions.
The big issues are long guns on the roster, no standard mag carry and expansion of red flags.
State calls them "Large Capacity Feeding Devices" - however they are the standard magazines supplied with most semiautomatic guns.
So, does this mean greater than 10 rounds then?
"Standard cap" has always been our side's preferred term for "mags holding more than ten rounds."
Yes, how many semiautomatics are shipped with magazines 10 rounds and under unless that particular model is purposely neutered for a ban state.
That was in one of the early house drafts. Some craziness about searlizing parts like barrels, slides ect. , and also having to notify the state anytime you made any change to your firearm . This was sheer stupidity and I guess someone with half a brain decided this would be impossible.I thought the language was more vague, at one point there was a bunch of noise in there about parts or some bullshit but maybe that was in one of the draft bills. Not that it matters anyways.
Yes anything pinned welded permently attached pinned and welded as long as the barrel isn't threaded. So all this can be done to a nonthereaded barrel. However a barrel that is threaded is an evil feature even if it has a permently attached device.Wondering if it would be better to wait until 10/23 or buy something before. Would just have to have whatever they put on the end welded, and that is it? Makes things easier.
Secondary question, do these guys still do welding on guns?
Micro Arc Welding, Inc. – Micro Dimensional Welding (formerly Pullman Arms)
So, does this mean greater than 10 rounds then?
Wut?Yes anything pinned welded permently attached pinned and welded as long as the barrel isn't threaded. So all this can be done to a nonthereaded barrel. However a barrel that is threaded is an evil feature even if it has a permently attached device.
Why should I be forced to used Large Capacity Feeding Device when it is objectively a standard capacity item.What do you mean by "standard mag"? Does the state call these that?
OK. Why not just say that in the first place then? I kind of thought this, but then with all the wordsmithing, thought I was missing something else. Just say what it is, instead of dancing around it!
Maybe I'm just slow or off, just getting back from vacation.