Would you shoot this ahole?

to be clear, the 'victim' was just driving behind this duesch and got brake checked for no reason whatsoever lol?
It doesn't f***ing matter what the guy in the truck did or not while driving. The moment you escalate like rager did, you become part of tthe problem and likely exceed the
"original offender" by a mile.

Also "brake checking" is always more faggot maneuvers that directly escalate and lead shit like this. "Oh let me brake check this guy because he offended me. "

Only faggots do that shit. Just drive away instead. It's a lot easier. [rofl] "ZOMG IM SO OFFENDED BY THE BAD DRIVING I HAVE TO BE MORE RETARDED THAN HIM!!! GWBWEEEEEUH!": [rofl] its the most f***ed concept ive ever heard of. "Yeah let me induce someone to possibly rear end my car because he exposed me to danger before, so ill intentionally induce it some more" I guess the thinking is maybe they can commit insurance fraud or something? not sure. its coo-coo retard thinking.
 
C’mon we’re not all like that. Been driving one for 10 years. My neighbor, also a big 2a guy, has 3 of them (his wife and daughter drive them). He’s definitely someone I want on my side if SHTF.

Perhaps if you narrowed it down to a specific color.
Fellow BMW driver for over 15 years and I think there are just as many Ahole truck drivers 😁
 
Does not mean he doesnt drive like BMW asswhole! Lol….
Im no longer bias to any car/driver combo
Well maybe SAAB’s
 

They charged him with, among other things, attempted armed robbery? The guy is an utter moron, but, attempted armed robbery? Is that because he attempted to grab the phone?

“He was slapped with slew of charges, including aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, attempted armed robbery and simple battery.”
 
It doesn't f***ing matter what the guy in the truck did or not while driving.

lol, yeah ok ...... retard in back prob brake checked retard in front and then got re brake checked. Luckily if you live in mass, you'll get a nice mandatory class on how to de-escalate if you want to renew your ltc :p
 
CT was a breeze, and frankly never had many problems there on the highways.
I have never made it down 91 with out someone, with CT plates, shooting out of the left hand exit only lane long after the line went solid white and usually after that lane has already started to turn. Was much worse when they still had toll booths. Everyone seemed to be unable to just pick a lane and stay in it.
 
Last edited:
Obviously, it's not worth the time, cost, aggravation to shoot someone if there is any other way to safely extricate yourself from the issue.

However, if you are sitting in a car with your loved ones, and the guy gets out of his car with a gun, and offers up ability, opportunity and jeopardy, I think you are justified in throwing down on him from behind cover. Shows the importance of avoiding such things, because you are almost a sitting duck in that situation.
 
How does a guy with a gun waving around get that close to your car? Unless you ran out of gas WTF are you stopping for?
 
This is why people need to EDC an AR pistol in 300BLK with suppressor and binary trigger. The bad guys have Glocks now, not just knives and fists. When civilians got guns, cops tooled up harder and now look like tier 1 boys. Civilians going about should upgrade as well.
 
CT was a breeze, and frankly never had many problems there on the highways.
Depends where. The Hartford to Waterbury stretch, you got shitboxes going 40 in a 65. Fairfield county, cause everybody 'makes too much money', their time is way more valuable than yours and you'll see zig zagging porsches cutting from left most lane to exit.
 
I would "assume" the driver will lose his right to carry or certainly it get suspended for a period of time?
He's looking at some pretty big charges. I just looked up his arrest and they got him on

Robbery with a firearm
2 counts of aggravated assualt with weapon without intent to kill
2 counts of battery
 
It doesn't f***ing matter what the guy in the truck did or not while driving. The moment you escalate like rager did, you become part of tthe problem and likely exceed the
"original offender" by a mile.

Also "brake checking" is always more faggot maneuvers that directly escalate and lead shit like this. "Oh let me brake check this guy because he offended me. "

Only faggots do that shit. Just drive away instead. It's a lot easier. [rofl] "ZOMG IM SO OFFENDED BY THE BAD DRIVING I HAVE TO BE MORE RETARDED THAN HIM!!! GWBWEEEEEUH!": [rofl] its the most f***ed concept ive ever heard of. "Yeah let me induce someone to possibly rear end my car because he exposed me to danger before, so ill intentionally induce it some more" I guess the thinking is maybe they can commit insurance fraud or something? not sure. its coo-coo retard thinking.
I don't understand the concept of 'brake check", if you hit your brakes causing the guy behind you to rear-end you, don't you get your own car trashed as well? Is the idea that someone hitting the front of their car against the rear of your car would cause more damage to their car?
 
Back
Top Bottom