- Joined
- Jan 8, 2013
- Messages
- 2,831
- Likes
- 537
Ive been beating my rep like a drum - all with great, factual articles with a twist of (politely) grow some balls
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
This is good on it's face value but it needs to be voted on and denounced for the Anti-2A crap that it is. IMHO.
This is good on it's face value but it needs to be voted on and denounced for the Anti-2A crap that it is. IMHO.
No, the last thing we want is for this to go to the floor of either the House or the Senate. It's much better for a bill to die early, even before it's assigned to a committee. The next best thing is for it to be sent to a study.
If we are going to be effective in opposing these bills, we need to learn the process. That's what Jim Wallace does and it's what anyone who wants to be effective has to do.
This is good on it's face value but it needs to be voted on and denounced for the Anti-2A crap that it is. IMHO.
I think it being stalled in committees and never seeing the light of day is best.
When pushed, I would tend to believe that more would cave, rather than stand against it.
This is their easiest way to bury these bills without having to do anything publicly.
So I can buy an AR for $700 again?
-tapatalk and Devin McCourty blow chunks-
My contention is that the whole bill is not getting enough attention. I fear that the ignorance that is prevalent in MA today is almost too much to surmount with satisfaction of dying bills.
Far too many people that I have spoken with or written to had no idea about the difference between this bill and the president's PR show.
If this dies will all the people that are up in arms going to maintain the same momentum? I truly pray that they do.
Together all 2A supporters could affect the same outcome of future bills as this one.
BUT what scares me is that a bill 'from out of thin air' gets more support before we get a chance to see it.
Obviously the past couple of weeks of staunch PRO 2A support has helped with this bill but what if this was introduced without all the backlash of the president's stunt?
I fear the risk associated with bost possibilities.
I think it being stalled in committees and never seeing the light of day is best.
When pushed, I would tend to believe that more would cave, rather than stand against it.
This is their easiest way to bury these bills without having to do anything publicly.
The problem with that, it could be tied up in litigation for years. They would let it die, only to try to reintroduce it at a later time. Maybe, if we can continue, we can get a change of guard, and not have to revisit it....I know, wishful thinknig...My opinion, they are trying to see what happens with the New York bill when it gets enforced.
Awesome news! But we can't rest. Linsky's bill is still in play.