Parker Schreiber
NES Member
- Joined
- Sep 29, 2020
- Messages
- 1,759
- Likes
- 2,557
A "General location warrant" is impermissible. A search warrant has to specify what's being searched for. For example, in the case I link to below, the court ruled that a clause reading "any other illegally kept controlled drugs or firearms of various descriptions" was invalid.Lotsa misinformation here. Let me clear some up:
- Locked safes are not subject to general location warrant. If a safe is found on-premises, it needs a warrant to access it
In Commonwealth vs. Manuel J. Fernandes, after being served a search warrant, the defendant "voluntarily" opened the safe containing coke and hash. The court ruled against the motion to suppress, not because of consent, but solely on the basis of the valid part of the warrant.
U.S. v. Wright, 704 F.2d 420 (8 Cir. 1983) and United States v. Johnson,709 F.2d 515 (8 Cir. 1983), for example, also held that a warrant for the premises included the power to open a locked safe. If you know of cases ruling otherwise, I'd love to see them.