Jsfitzgerald85
NES Member
Probably the same idiots who somehow think democrats are anti-war.I bet there are some that might actually believe it themselves.
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Probably the same idiots who somehow think democrats are anti-war.I bet there are some that might actually believe it themselves.
No grandfathering
So we have to turn in "illegal" guns under this version?? I don't think so, fruck them.
Throw them in the swamp at Bagada?You forgot one View attachment 843245
The black ones. The black ones are more dangerous. Common knowledge.Who the hell knows but I wish they would hurry up and define dangerous as I need the help. Every time I open my safe I am very leery and cautious as I never know which of my firearms are peaceful and which ones are the dangerous ones, its quite nerve wracking....
You forgot one View attachment 843245
That wasn’t my intention. It is a feature not a bug.You make it sound like that’s not their intention.
Actually the reverse, I have always felt very strongly about it and have voted in every single election large and small for the last 40 odd years.Easy to say, when I assume you don’t vote
Thats the house bill not the senate bill.
All of it. They don't care.How much of this violates Bruen and when do we get FPC/Comm2A/GOAL to get a lawsuit going if (when) it gets passed?
Pretty sure the timing on this was to throw it in the face of BruenHow much of this violates Bruen and when do we get FPC/Comm2A/GOAL to get a lawsuit going if (when) it gets passed?
It would seem to run a fowl with suitability if they really intend to allow each city or town decide what 2A rights they may let you have.How much of this violates Bruen and when do we get FPC/Comm2A/GOAL to get a lawsuit going if (when) it gets passed?
Exactly. They will get together and hammer out something that will will please the grand dragon, Maura Healey.Thats the house bill not the senate bill.
Eventually there will be some reconciliation between them.
All of it.How much of this violates Bruen and when do we get FPC/Comm2A/GOAL to get a lawsuit going if (when) it gets passed?
REPTILE, you can lower the price of your Noveske lower.
You won't stop ranges. Most do it becuase they think they will be in the good grace of the overlord CLEO.When some version of this dumpster fire passes, if it still has support of MCOPA, no FFL should sell anything to LEO, and no ranges should allow LEO members or host LEO training events. Full stop. I'm sure that won't happen though, and we'll embrace the boot.
Depressing, isn't it?You won't stop ranges. Most do it becuase they think they will be in the good race of the overlord CLEO.
Because the people at the range making these desicions are a bunch of FUDDS.
As far as the FFL, I 100% agree with you. Someone could argue the business is in the business of making a profit. And I agree, but in this case they would be supporting the people and supported a law costing the FFL business. For some it might be a tough choice to make, but I will do the same. No shopping at any FFL supporting the people that support turning me into a criminal.
Many times over the years they changed gun laws. Reaching back and turning some into criminals who were not so prior to the changes. A clear violation of the 4th amendment, yet they got away with it. I doubt they are very worried about grandfather clauses.
I have had several young Leftists laugh at me and say, we are just waiting until your generation dies off, then we run the show.grandfathers are the class they hate most
That language is not part of S2572 and not relevant when considering the bill. Think of them as wholly unrelated to one another. The only linkage is pure legislative hijinks. Take S2572 as a modification of existing MGL and that is it. What the house proposed is not in play.