Maryland AWB case Snope v Brown going to SCOTUS. (Formerly Bianchi v Brown & Bianchi v Frosh)

Nightshift said:
As Bianchi v. Frosh, distributed for conference 3 times before it was GVR'd
As Snope v Brown, distributed for conference 5 times now. 6 if it gets re-listed for March 7th.
Yes, WTF?
Click to expand...
And since it's essentially the same case - WTF
Dobbs was resisted 12 times
Masterpiece Cakeshop 14 times
Relist record: Ryan v Hurles for 23 times (then dismissed by state request)
 
pastera said:
And since it's essentially the same case - WTF
Dobbs was resisted 12 times
Masterpiece Cakeshop 14 times
Relist record: Ryan v Hurles for 23 times (then dismissed by state request)
Click to expand...
The Dobbs case was "distributed for conference" a total of 22 times.

So the Snope (7) and Ocean State (8) cases have a ways to go before reaching a similar distributed for conference total. Bruen was only distributed for conference four times.
 
They are going to hold it in purgatory. I think we have a better chance at a Trump/Pelosi sex tape than SCOTUS taking this case.

Unless they know something we don’t. The imminent retiring of a left leaning justice so they are waiting until they get a gun friendly one? Only positive thing I can think of.
 
Also, maybe they’re waiting to include Hanson vs. District of Columbia that was just picked up last month. Another mag cap case that SCOTUS has taken on.
 
Commentary on the Mexico case:

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NA4WNR0zxwk

A massive case if before the United States Spreme Court today for oral arguments. Washington Gun Law President, William Kirk, discusses the matter of Smith & Wesson v. Mexico, a case which has the potential to destroy the firearms industry if allowed to proceed. This case has not garnered the attention that many other 2A cases have, but its importance cannot be overstated. So learn more today and arm yourself with education.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cXlP5Vyolmw

The US Supreme Court will hear oral arguments tomorrow in Mexico v. Smith & Wesson case. Mark Smith Four Boxes Diner discusses...

DC mag ban challenge before SCOTUS today:
bearingarms.com

Challenge to D.C. Ban on Magazines Presented to U.S. Supreme Court

bearingarms.com bearingarms.com
 
It would be real nice is the SC would just come out and spell out "Shall not be infringed" is EXACTLY what we meant in Bruen. So no more safe spaces, no more gun or mag bans, no more excessive stuff. Rule on one case and then refernce 18 others as "colosslly stupid by the state."

It won't happen, but it would be nice. Just put it to bed. I know, Bruen should have. But I'll continue to point to mASS having a busing problem 2 decades after THAT Supreme Court ruling. So. . . . .
 
Dennis in MA said:
It would be real nice is the SC would just come out and spell out "Shall not be infringed" is EXACTLY what we meant in Bruen. So no more safe spaces, no more gun or mag bans, no more excessive stuff. Rule on one case and then refernce 18 others as "colosslly stupid by the state."

It won't happen, but it would be nice. Just put it to bed. I know, Bruen should have. But I'll continue to point to mASS having a busing problem 2 decades after THAT Supreme Court ruling. So. . . . .
Click to expand...
Well, Heller stated the 2A applied to citizens and the Blue States simply ignored it. Even if infringement was defined it would be ignored as well.
 
sbhaven said:

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SICgaiHPD3g

SCOTUS heard oral arguments today in Mexico v. Smith & Wesson case. Mark Smith Four Boxes Diner discusses...
Click to expand...

TL;DW - SCOTUS definitely going to reverse the 1st Circuit and rule in favor of Smith & Wesson, but the ruling is most likely going to be narrow ducking the proximate cause issue under federal law, allowing for state law based lawsuits to continue. 2A movement wants a broad ruling that prevents any possible frivolous state lawsuits from being filed, which it doesn’t look like we’re going to get in this case.
 
Longer Mark Smith video on the Mexico gun case where he plays audio clips from the oral arguments, and comments on them.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WYWiKH1-fvM

SCOTUS held a major oral argument in Mexico v. Smith & Wesson involving the 2nd Amendment and Mark Smith Four Boxes Diner discusses with recordings from the oral argument in this video.
 
T-Unit said:
Barrett is the fly in the SCOTUS 2A ointment. As long as she is on the court, there will be no movement on AWB or magazines.

She is worse than Justice Kennedy.
Click to expand...
reason.com

See, I Told You So

One of my many thankless tasks is to criticize conservatives. In many regards, this work is more unpleasant than criticizing liberals. When I talk about
reason.com reason.com
 
The Barrett nomination was rushed through in record time. It was very close to the 2020 election so it was rushed or nothing.

It's concerning for sure but in my lifetime nothing will ever come close to the RINO John Sununu telling the RINO G W H Bush that David Souter would be a perfect pick for SCOTUS.....
 

Similar threads

Garland v. VanDerStok
Replies
0
Views
142
lutstribe
L
9th Circuit En Banc Rules As Expected For California In Duncan v. Bonta Mag Ban (Judge VanDyke Dissent Video Included)
Replies
22
Views
731
Coyote33
Coyote33
Former UFC Champion Cain Velasquez Sentenced To Five Years In Prison For Attempted Murder Of Alleged Child Molester
Replies
17
Views
347
Token_Black_Guy
T
SCOTUS denies cert on two 2A cases.
Replies
11
Views
902
M1911
M1911
GOAL's Westbrook Case Update/Summary
Replies
4
Views
267
Parker Schreiber
Parker Schreiber
Back
Top Bottom