Maryland AWB case Snope v Brown going to SCOTUS. (Formerly Bianchi v Brown & Bianchi v Frosh)

Mmmmm. Maybe.

I could spin it a different way. The USSC went on an active court rampage from teh mid-50's through recent past. The current court is trying to get back to the historic intent of the court.

Historical average is 100 cases a year. We're below that now. I'm not sure if I ahve a problem with that or not. Given that the chances of them F'ing up (like Congress) is higher than 50/50, I only want to see a case come up because it will be a game-changer. Otherwise, there's a risk they F it up.
 
T-Unit said:
The problem is that semi automatics are in common use, so Congress changing language in the NFA to include it would be struck down. As to the court ruling anything not an MG is protected, that wouldn't come up in the Brown case because the court focuses on the question, which in this case is MG related, so the ruling is going to be either, yes it can be regulated/banned or not and if it's not then MG's are good to go and the court is never going to do that.

So, the court is just kicking the issue. They are waiting for a snoozer of a 2A case that has little impact on anything to virtue signal. At this rate, I don't think the court is ever going to grant cert to Snope or OST, not until Roberts or Barrett are off the bench which won't be for another 10-15 years.
Click to expand...
What I stated was that Brown IS a slam dunk for SCOTUS - there is an 8-1 support for machinegun NOT being protected.
My point was that Roberts loves to split the baby so taking a machinegun case would be an easy reach.
And in that opinion in order to bring in the textualists, they could find that the line between protected and "dangerous and unusual" is the line between semiautomatic and machinegun.
That gives something to both sides and takes something away.
Will they do it? Not likely
And the Vanderstock case proves they are drawing a clear line - yoy have the right to keep and bear, but only what the government knows you have and what the great black robes feel safe with.
 
So, back to the Snope thing.

50/50 that it gets mentioned tomorrow or Monday?

How does that work, anyhow? Is it Friday we need to look for, or Monday? Seems like it has changed over time. Maybe this thread should just be locked, so it no longer gets discussed.
 
Nightshift said:
Hmmmmmm...........

Yesterday 3/24, Snope was distributed for conference on Friday 3/28.
Ocean State is not, so far.

Until now, they have been distributed at the same time.
Something to do with the Duncan v Bonta decision?
Click to expand...
3 different cases, 3 different threads:

  1. Snope (this one)
  2. Ocean State over here: Ocean State Tactical vs Neronha (Rhode Island Fed court, Mag Limit case) Update AWB proposed
  3. Duncan v Bonta over here: 9th Circuit En Banc Rules As Expected For California In Duncan v. Bonta Mag Ban (Judge VanDyke Dissent Video Included)
 
Last edited:
Reminder about tomorrow:

Today at the Court - Friday, Mar 28, 2025​

  • The Supreme Court Building is open to the public from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m.
  • The Justices will meet in a private conference to discuss cases and vote on petitions for review.
  • The Court will release an order list at 9:30 a.m. on Monday, March 31.
  • Courtroom Lectures available within the next 30 days.
Edit to add: BOTH Snope and Ocean State are distributed for tomorrows conference day.
Snope: Docket for 24-203

Mar 24 2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/28/2025.
Ocean State Tactical: Docket for 24-131

Mar 24 2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/28/2025.
 
Coyote33 said:
So what does this mean, exactly? I see no news about anything having to do with today, this subject, and the Supreme Court. I don't see anything for Monday, either.
🤷‍♂️ 🤷‍♂️ 🤷‍♂️
Click to expand...
Look up ONE post from yours. Distributed for conference means exactly that. Both the Snope and Ocean State Tactical cases have been assigned (aka distributed) to the next SCOTUS conference day, which is today. And as my post above indicates the "Orders List" that comes out of todays conference will be released Monday at 9:30 am.
 
Coyote33 said:
So what does this mean, exactly? I see no news about anything having to do with today, this subject, and the Supreme Court. I don't see anything for Monday, either.
🤷‍♂️ 🤷‍♂️ 🤷‍♂️
Click to expand...

Yet again,
Picton said:
In all sincerity, if anything happens that's of earth-shaking importance? You're not going to have to ask about it here. It'll be all over the site. Until then, just wait.
Click to expand...
 
sbhaven said:
Look up ONE post from yours. Distributed for conference means exactly that. Both the Snope and Ocean State Tactical cases have been assigned (aka distributed) to the next SCOTUS conference day, which is today. And as my post above indicates the "Orders List" that comes out of todays conference will be released Monday at 9:30 am.
Click to expand...
That’s coyotes thing

He jsut does this for some odd reason
 
Picton said:
Yet again,
Click to expand...
MickeyD’s said:
That’s coyotes thing He jsut does this for some odd reason
Click to expand...
drgrant said:
We've told him about 982 times... There's literally no use to monitoring cases at a micro level unless you're a legal geek/nerd. Otherwise its a waste of his time. I don't even do it
anymore.
Click to expand...
You guys are killing me! You're the ones who got this all ramped up over the course of this thread. Now that I am on this trail, and am looking for what everyone has been talking about for months now, you all pull out and say it's just me? Ha ha, too much.


Darksideblues42 said:
Unless they wild-card it and publish the acceptance notice after close of business today. SCOTUS has done that before.
Click to expand...
Ha ha. Fuel on the fire! ;-)
 
Coyote33 said:
You guys are killing me! You're the ones who got this all ramped up over the course of this thread. Now that I am on this trail, and am looking for what everyone has been talking about for months now, you all pull out and say it's just me? Ha ha, too much.
Click to expand...

If you're that interested... Maybe do some of your own legwork for once instead of asking for the spoon fed toddler version? I myself am at the point where I don't care enough to
look at the micro state of these cases anymore, just the beginning and the outcome (when that happens). Everything in between?" thats like watching a pot of water boil for 2-10 years.
 
Coyote33 said:
You guys are killing me! You're the ones who got this all ramped up over the course of this thread. Now that I am on this trail, and am looking for what everyone has been talking about for months now, you all pull out and say it's just me? Ha ha, too much.



Ha ha. Fuel on the fire! ;-)
Click to expand...
We accept you for who you are
 
LittleCalm said:
U

Is this the same as being a nipple head? I am pretty sure it’s essentially the same.
Click to expand...
No. @Coyote33 is not a nipplehead. He just is trying to wrap his head around the complexity of the garbage. I used to geek out over this myself but there's so many layers of garbage here. I do read into some of the cases but on the 4D chess that happens in the middle? Its understandable to not know what it means till it washes out at the end. Never give up hope, while simultaneously realize each one of these is a 26-100mile MARATHON and not just the 100yd dash.
 
drgrant said:
No. @Coyote33 is not a nipplehead. He just is trying to wrap his head around the complexity of the garbage. I used to geek out over this myself but there's so many layers of garbage here. I do read into some of the cases but on the 4D chess that happens in the middle? Its understandable to not know what it means till it washes out at the end. Never give up hope, while simultaneously realize each one of these is a 26-100mile MARATHON and not just the 100yd dash.
Click to expand...
Why so serious? 😂
 
You guys don't understand that John Roberts is too busy hanging out with Judge Boasberg in their Eyes Wide Shut judicial sex club and Amy Barrett is occupied flicking her bean at the thought of rape survivors giving birth to rape babies because abortion got canned in multiple states for either to grant cert to cases that are obviously in violation of Bruen.
 
T-Unit said:
You guys don't understand that John Roberts is too busy hanging out with Judge Boasberg in their Eyes Wide Shut judicial sex club and Amy Barrett is occupied flicking her bean at the thought of rape survivors giving birth to rape babies because abortion got canned in multiple states for either to grant cert to cases that are obviously in violation of Bruen.
Click to expand...

What club? Are you a member and saw it?
 
Reminder: Orders List from this past Friday's SCOTUS Conference Day is being released tomorrow (Monday) at 9:30 am.

Snope: Docket for 24-203
Ocean State Tactical: Docket for 24-131

Today at the Court - Monday, Mar 31, 2025
  • The Court will release an order list at 9:30 a.m.
  • The Court will convene for a public session in the Courtroom at 10 a.m. The Justices will hear two oral arguments. An audio feed will be live-streamed, and the audio will be available on the Court's website later in the day.
  • Seating for the oral argument session will be provided to the public, members of the Supreme Court Bar, and press. The three-minute line will be temporarily suspended. The Supreme Court Building will be otherwise closed to the public.
  • The Supreme Court Building will reopen to the public following the conclusion of the Court session and close at 3 p.m.
 
sbhaven said:
Reminder: Orders List from this past Friday's SCOTUS Conference Day is being released tomorrow (Monday) at 9:30 am.

Snope: Docket for 24-203
Ocean State Tactical: Docket for 24-131

Today at the Court - Monday, Mar 31, 2025
  • The Court will release an order list at 9:30 a.m.
  • The Court will convene for a public session in the Courtroom at 10 a.m. The Justices will hear two oral arguments. An audio feed will be live-streamed, and the audio will be available on the Court's website later in the day.
  • Seating for the oral argument session will be provided to the public, members of the Supreme Court Bar, and press. The three-minute line will be temporarily suspended. The Supreme Court Building will be otherwise closed to the public.
  • The Supreme Court Building will reopen to the public following the conclusion of the Court session and close at 3 p.m.
Click to expand...
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2482.jpeg
    IMG_2482.jpeg
    37 KB · Views: 45
Newton's first law states bodies at rest or in motion remain so unless acted upon by another force.

There's no force pushing the court to grant cert, not when 2 of the justices are unknowns as to how they'll rule.

The force that will is a circuit split, which won't happen for another 30 years.
 

Similar threads

Garland v. VanDerStok
Replies
0
Views
142
lutstribe
L
9th Circuit En Banc Rules As Expected For California In Duncan v. Bonta Mag Ban (Judge VanDyke Dissent Video Included)
Replies
22
Views
714
Coyote33
Coyote33
Former UFC Champion Cain Velasquez Sentenced To Five Years In Prison For Attempted Murder Of Alleged Child Molester
Replies
17
Views
346
Token_Black_Guy
T
SCOTUS denies cert on two 2A cases.
Replies
3
Views
517
Coyote33
Coyote33
GOAL's Westbrook Case Update/Summary
Replies
4
Views
266
Parker Schreiber
Parker Schreiber
Back
Top Bottom