GM-GUY
NES Member
Newly appointed? Try "nominated", let's not get ahead of ourselves.
I don’t trust the ‘GOP’ Senate at all - Mitch is still in charge.
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/MFS May Giveaway ***Canik METE SFX***
Newly appointed? Try "nominated", let's not get ahead of ourselves.
Any initial news on how it looks, either for this or the Pullman case?Hearing scheduled for January 9th. The Comm2A Worman webpage has the filings.
I Wasn't able to attend and I don't know anyone who was there. Audio recordings should be available tomorrow. I will post them as soon as possible.Any initial news on how it looks, either for this or the Pullman case?
Did they send a first year intern for this? From my hearing of this audio, she got slapped around like I've never seen before... any Attorney opinions here?Oral argument audio. Commonwealth lost, back to DC to deal with the merits.
Basically, the Commonwealth had no business filing this appeal and they ultimately agreed.
Oral argument audio. Commonwealth lost, back to DC to deal with the merits.
so what was the outcome?
Wrong case. You're thinking of Worman.So the state's argument is that they are not self defense because no recorded use but they are military weapons because they have no recorded military use but look like military weapons that do have a recorded use?
Basically, the Commonwealth had no business filing this appeal and they ultimately agreed.
Did anyone listen long enough the hear one of the judges telling NSSF's attorney that his daughter should think about med school.
He means Fuhrer Healey had no business filing an interlocutory appeal about a spurious 11th amendment issue.By "Commonwealth", does this mean "Comm2A", or the "Commonwealth of Massachusetts"?
There are two MA AWB-related separate cases at play here filed by different plaintiffs with different causes of action that are at different stages of proceedings. Making it extra confusing, CA1 scheduled the Pullman/NSSF 11th amendment interlocutory appeal for the same day as the Worman appeal hearing, which is why links to both were posted.I think we had a incorrect link that has fouled things up.
Were the relevant verbal arguments:
A) A 14 minute file of the AG getting raked over the coals on an appeal
B)34 minute debate over heller?
Media release from the NSSF:
Federal Appeals Court Dismisses Mass. AG’s Appeal • NSSF
There are two MA AWB-related separate cases at play here filed by different plaintiffs with different causes of action that are at different stages of proceedings. Making it extra confusing, CA1 scheduled the Pullman/NSSF 11th amendment interlocutory appeal for the same day as the Worman appeal hearing, which is why links to both were posted.
The 14-minute clip was related to the interlocutory appeal in the NSSF/Pullman case.
When they wrote those letters I thought it was a good thing, probably is, but in reality it was a way for them to put a foot on either side of the line and wait to see who wins. Then claim they supported them from the beginning.Republican Gov. Charlie Baker and his administration wrote letters of concern over perceived ambiguity in the notice, while 58 lawmakers, including 18 Democrats, sent Ms. Healey a letter objecting to her action “in the strongest possible terms.”
Now that there is blood in the water, they want to be seen as being on the right side.
When they wrote those letters I thought it was a good thing, probably is, but in reality it was a way for them to put a foot on either side of the line and wait to see who wins. Then claim they supported them from the beginning.
In addition, it would have been nice for the article to mention that the letters from both Baker and the Legislature demanded a response to specific questions. Healey ignored them. Maybe a follow-up email to the reporter asking "I found the letters mentioned in your article from the legislature, it asks AG Healey to respond to specific questions. I cannot find any actual response, can you investigate if she ever replied?"