The Conference Committee has sent official language out - h.4885

nstassel said:
No this is a pure healy ban rifle. I had one that was dismissed which was non compliant and also cited healy.
Click to expand...
If that happens - how long should we expect to sit in jail?

Was the person actually arrested? Was he let out on bail?

I'm looking to fight this tooth and nail as the legal bill is hopefully less expensive than buying a new house in NH.

Of course, any guns that I may or may not have are buried deep in the woods, but I still want to have a plan.
 
Last edited:
MAJoe said:
''Assault weapon'', shall have the same meaning as a semiautomatic assault weapon as defined in the federal Public Safety and Recreational Firearms Use Protection Act, 18 U.S.C. section 921(a)(30) as appearing in such section on September 13, 1994, and shall include, but not be limited to, any of the weapons, or copies or duplicates of the weapons, of any caliber, known as: (i) Avtomat Kalashnikov (AK) (all models); (ii) Action Arms Israeli Military Industries UZI and Galil; (iii) Beretta Ar70 (SC–70); (iv) Colt AR–15; (v) Fabrique National FN/FAL, FN/LAR and FNC; (vi) SWD M–10, M–11, M–11/9 and M–12; (vi) Steyr AUG; (vii) INTRATEC TEC–9, TEC–DC9 and TEC–22; and (viii) revolving cylinder shotguns, such as, or similar to, the Street Sweeper and Striker 12
Click to expand...

Thanks. I thought it was a longer list for some reason.
 
Broc Tuah said:
I lost all respect for GUIDA when I heard some of the sh*t he pulled with some FLLs (don't ask, I will not post details).

I would only pay GUIDA if my goal was to either end in jail or with a plea agreement. Seems to be the best he can do.

That is my opinion until someone can provide me with good reasons to change it.
Click to expand...
From what I have heard, you're not wrong.
 
Laderbuilt said:
So say one has an 80% lower that is still at %80 should they register that before 8/1? For when the time comes it’s good to go?
Click to expand...
Per the letter of the bill a copy or duplicate must have been registered prior to 7/20/16 in order to be exempted.
However, the bill is confusing so if it's an 80% and you registered it thinking that the law now requires it then if the optimist side of the argument is correct then it will be grandfathered.
If the pessimistic side is right then you registered a paperweight.
No real loss either way
 
vicorjh said:
We'll be dropping Guida for future work. Can't make out if he's an agent for the state or a Maura mouthpiece.
Click to expand...
I don't think he's (currently) an agent of the state but some indicators of perhaps him being high off smelling his own farts.... are evident, based on things ive seen and heard from others.
 
nstassel said:
In fact one was charged with a post healy compliant rifle.
Click to expand...

But ... how was this person charged?

Did the state look at FA10 records and go after this person or was something else going on and they just threw that out there to add weight to the list of charges?

I am not asking for details, I understand you can't share certain info.
 
Broc Tuah said:
But ... how was this person charged?

Did the state look at FA10 records and go after this person or was something else going on and they just threw that out there to add weight?

I am not asking for details, I understand you can't share certain info.
Click to expand...
A guy's license was suspended and they found the rifle and he told the police the dealer who sold it to him.
 
drgrant said:
If you are thinking about registering an 80% build, just sell it to someone first that knows better. That's what we call "defeating the purpose".
Click to expand...
I just want to add one more gun that can be left behind when we finally make the move. That’s my motivation behind it
 
not new guy said:
What I don't get is how they can justify different treatment for pre-2016 and post-2016 guns. All are AWs per her enforcement notice, which at the end of the day was just... an enforcement notice. If one group is an illegal AW so is the other. If one was legally possessed so was the other.
Click to expand...
Because her enforcement notice was done under Chevron deference where the courts were force to defer to the regulating agency's interpretation of an ambiguous statute or regulation.
Copies and duplicates was never clearly defined in the law so the controlling agency was open to interpret it how they saw fit.
 
Laderbuilt said:
I just want to add one more gun that can be left behind when we finally make the move. That’s my motivation behind it
Click to expand...

Honestly, if that is the reason you are doing it, don't bother.

You are involving the gov in your life so that one day you can sell a rifle when leaving, that is a horrible idea.

Not only you are involving the gov, you are involving them through a lie becauae an 80% is not a firearm, so you are creating an FA10 of something that doesn't exist.
 
Foudre said:
He did work for the Massachusetts government at one point, didn't he?
Click to expand...
Yes he did and while he was working for the state he tried to jamb me up real good. This is not the place or the post to tell the story, however if anyone would like the details contact me.
 
Reptile said:
If that happens - how long should we expect to sit in jail?

Was the person actually arrested? Was he let out on bail?

I'm looking to fight this tooth and nail as the legal bill is hopefully less expensive than buying a new house in NH.

Of course, any guns that I may or may not have are buried deep in the woods, but I still want to have a plan.
Click to expand...

#GoFundMeForReptile

Just send me a link, buddy!
 

Similar threads

Check out TSUSA @ the Great American Outdoor Show
Replies
0
Views
34
TargetSportsUSA
TargetSportsUSA
Overheard at the airport
4 5 6
Replies
154
Views
3K
dcmdon
dcmdon
Post in the correct forums
2 3 4
Replies
96
Views
2K
StevieP
StevieP
The H&K P7 M13 is Coming Back? The P7 Pro at SHOT Show 2025!
2
Replies
59
Views
582
Tartakovsky
Tartakovsky
H&K suppressor sights
Replies
0
Views
37
Sam P
S
Back
Top Bottom