- Joined
- Jan 5, 2008
- Messages
- 8,488
- Likes
- 6,401
Motions hearing scheduled for Feb 9th. The judge seems to be moving this one along.
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/Pioneer Valley Arms February Giveaway ***Smith & Wesson SD9VE 9MM***
The decision will most likely be based on what the presiding judge would like to see as public policy, rather than points of law.
that sounds like a trial by mob, may be the judge needs some outing and free publicity then ... to keep his/her decisions in line with mob.
That in it self, should be enough to remove a judge from the bench ! WTFThe decision will most likely be based on what the presiding judge would like to see as public policy, rather than points of law.
Fixed it !The July 2016 edict was Left-wing Statist Gang Initiation: she had to prove herself worthy of the Cabinet by taking a giant shit on MA gun owners.
Her ambitions are beyond shithole Massachusetts, her best bet at this point is a Warren Vice Presidency so she can backfill Left-wing Statist Senator from MA. She needs to get as far away from MA as possible before SCotUS gets a hold of her edict in a couple years.
Fixed it !
I doubt Warren-Mora ticket, too much NorthEast for a national run, moonbats of CA and NJ and NY want in too and there is no more vicious than your own moonbats backstabbing you ala Clinton-Bernie rape.
In any case, thank you for the update, it would be interesting to see how this pans out soon enough.
SameLooking forward to hearing updates!
...Patiently waiting.Looking forward to hearing updates!
...Patiently waiting.
For what? There was no hearing. Motions were just submitted last week. Hearing is not until end of month IIRC....Patiently waiting.
Yeah.... Crap, I forgot it got moved up because it was at BU law. It ended a little while ago. I don't like for us to give updates on it, because it's usually tinged with confidential info even if we try to hide that. Anyhow, hopefully someone went who can give a more detailed report. I will keep en eye out for the transcript.sooooo..... Nothing today?
Back in December, Rob called it..The decision will most likely be based on what the presiding judge would like to see as public policy, rather than points of law.