Isn't this step one to a related lawsuit?Great.
We're fukked.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/Pioneer Valley Arms February Giveaway ***Smith & Wesson SD9VE 9MM***
Isn't this step one to a related lawsuit?Great.
We're fukked.
I dont see where there would be an issue if the application was sent in prior to 20JUL.
However, it is unclear whether State law permits the possessor of such an "assault weapon" to make an NFA firearm out of the assault weapon after this date, or whether State law would prohibit this action.
The notice makes clear that the guidance will not be enforced against gun owners who bought or sold these weapons prior to July 20, 2016
Here .......... does this help your understanding?
Has any MA residents received back an approved 5320.20 Application to Transport Interstate recently? Since the new AG ruling? How long did it take?
I just mailed mine the other day..form 20 to leave the state wont be a problem.
Now if you filed to bring into MA you might have a problem.
Ill update when im approved. My guess is less than 30 days
I don't recall the exact date I sent mine in, It was probably 2nd week of December
Youll be fine....I sent one in first week of december, for the nes NH shoots. we'll see…
Has any MA residents received back an approved 5320.20 Application to Transport Interstate recently? Since the new AG ruling? How long did it take?
I sent one in first week of december, for the nes NH shoots. we'll see…
You won't get a response same as ATF won't either. That should speak volumes. If Mauras guidance was dead set law, then giving the ATF clarification would be no problem but Maura knows her guidance is illegal and unconstitutional so she ain't saying shit that could put her thru the federal ringer at a later date.This is probably a dumb question, but has anyone written to Healey's office specifically regarding the ATF's notification and asking how they plan on resolving the issue?
Might help shed some light...
EDIT: OK so against my better judgement I emailed the AG's office. Didn't use specifics or reference this thread of course. Just wanted some clarification on the matter. Will post if I get a reply.
You won't get a response same as ATF won't either. That should speak volumes. If Mauras guidance was dead set law, then giving the ATF clarification would be no problem but Maura knows her guidance is illegal and unconstitutional so she ain't saying shit that could put her thru the federal ringer at a later date.
Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk
I suspect Obama put a work slowdown on the forms, the have spiked from 170ish days around election to over 220 days to now.
Posting with permission from the recipient ............
From: Gary N Schaible
To: XXXXXXXXXXXXX
Sent: January 6, 2017 at 8:35 AM
Subject: RE: Ask the Expert Question from XXXXXXXX
OK – your application is on hold due to an issue with Massachusetts State law. Massachusetts law prohibits the possession and transfer of assault weapons and “copies or duplicates” of these firearms. On July 20, 2016, the Massachusetts Attorney General clarified the meaning of "copies or duplicates of banned assault rifles, including copies of the Colt AR-15'" under State law. Using two distinct tests, the Attorney General determined that a weapon is a copy or duplicate "if its internal operating system is essentially the same as those of a specifically-banned weapon or if the gun has key functional components that are interchangeable with those of a banned weapon."
The notice makes clear that the guidance will not be enforced against gun owners who bought or sold these weapons prior to July 20, 2016. However, it is unclear whether State law permits the possessor of such an "assault weapon" to make an NFA firearm out of the assault weapon after this date, or whether State law would prohibit this action. Because 26 U.S.C. 5822 requires that ATF deny any application to make an NFA firearm if the making “would place the person making the firearm in violation of the law,” ATF is seeking guidance from the Massachusetts Attorney General before it acts on any applications.
Once this issue is resolved, your application will be processed.
Great news, if you can please post wether it was a rifle or pistol caliber you had approved any any other details you feel like sharing. Just curious to see if any so-called AWB items being approved.
I just got a 8.5" 9mm sbr approved
What platform if you don't mind me asking?
Ar platform if that's what your asking. It was efiled in February, had pretty much given up on it getting approved