MA Gun Grab 2024: H.4885 - Passed legislature, headed to the governor

Status
Not open for further replies.
Did NY or CT have an FA-10 equivalent before requiring registration? If MA just rolls the FA-10 database into the registry, will you need to “(re)register” what they already have record of you owning? Whether accurate or not? If you don’t register what they have records of you owning, isn’t that just a roadmap of who’s ignoring the law?
 
I just realized, this "shroud" atrocity would make an M1 Garand, M1 Carbine, M1A/M14 are all illegal as the wood/plastic covers the barrel and prevents shooter from burring their hand. This is absolute insanity.

I don’t think so. The Garand does not have a detachable magazine, and the other two do not have pistol grips. But the shroud addition will make a lot of rifles illegal.
 
Last edited:
You're entirely missing the point.

There are people gun owners (people like you) actively antagonize and vilify and threaten and (joke) about doing harm to, and THEY VOTE. Not only do they vote, but all of their allies who are not queer vote. And they don't give a shit about your gun rights because you are, in their minds an existential threat to them and their friends.

You can whine about what you believe is "right" or "correct" or "immutable" or whatever, and vilify them, and they'll vote against your rights because you threaten their lives.

You don't have to like it, but you can't whine about them disliking you when you actively vilify them. If you want to maintain or regain gun rights, you can't expect that to happen when you talk the way you do about people you need as an ally. You don't have to *like* trans people, but you sure as hell need to shut the f*** up about it, and maybe even pretend that they have rights that need to be defended too.


As to the rest of your questions: I don't care at all if a trans woman is in the bathroom/locker room with my mother/wife/daughter. They're not a threat to me or anyone I know. Trans people are victims of violence so much more often than the perpetrators the latter category barely even exists. "gaybashing" still exists.

But you know who is a threat? Queerphobic people who threaten them. I taught an LTC class with a bunch of trans women in it. They were there literally because they felt threatened by people who talk the way you do. It's actually worse than that: Men and women who are not .. traditionally attractive, are getting beat up because transphobic shitballs think they're trans, and for some reason have a problem with it.
So by your own admission, "I don't care at all if a trans woman is in the bathroom/locker room with my mother/wife/daughter."

You are completely fine with a biological male exposing himself to your wife, daughter, or someone else's?

What the f*** is wrong with you?

Clearly, you need your opinions and beliefs to be accepted, just like the trans community. Reality is, you don't have to accept or believe in anything. It doesn't matter who's feelings get hurt, period.
 
Seems like a nice guy. Doesn't get it though. Voting in MA to fix this shit? As he said himself 50+ years of MA shitting on 2A.
He’s a complete f***tard. I’m not saying it’s wrong but voting anybody out or basically everything else he saying this f***ing stupid.

Just go about your business if shit goes sideways keep your mouth shut. Get a lawyer dig your heels in and see what happens.

I have the luxury of the ATF approving everything I’ve ever done and everything I bought was from a gun store so I really don’t understand how it’s going to affect me and that’s not the problem. It’s people younger than us who are really getting f***ing ass raped squeal piggy


View: https://youtu.be/9gLN3QoN-q8?si=tIHudXY9mz83sT5Y


This thing is so poorly f***ing written it’s gonna go to court and at least some of it’s gonna go ..

And then in 10 years, we can start the fight all over again

We all knew it was gonna get worse after the Supreme Court gave them a bitch slap. it’s just like the Supreme Court telling Biden he can’t forgive student debt, but he does it anyway and now we need term limits on the Supreme Court cause they don’t like the way the games played just keep moving the goalposts…

We need to term limits on the politicians. It’s one branch of politics, trying to take over the other.
 
Last edited:
Seems like a nice guy. Doesn't get it though. Voting in MA to fix this shit? As he said himself 50+ years of MA shitting on 2A.

This! Definitely appreciate the sentiment, but the level of political organization in order to develop and execute on a strategy that would actually unseat members of the House in the Senate just isn't there.

We would need to run reasonable (our definition != that of the majority) and appealing candidates in every single district in the Commonwealth (no small task in places like Melrose Newton, Lexington) in order to be effective here. And I just don't see that happening.

And even if you could unseat even a quarter of the legislature, unless you're in leadership your voice and vote mean nothing.

Like could I run for office? Sure. Do I want to? Hell no! That said, despite being here for quite a while now, I'm just not as invested here as someone who perhaps grew up here, has family here, etc.
 
I don’t think the intent is to go that far. Stocks are not barrel shrouds. Guess we’ll see.
"Guess we'll see" is right. 🤔

The description (from the text of the new law): A shroud that "encircles either all or part of the barrel designed to shield the bearer’s hand from heat..."

That is a classic anti-gun extremist trick if I ever saw one: Start by finding a simple benign identifying feature (could have been literally anything) and then make the definition so broad in your new gun ban law so as to include ANYTHING AND EVERYTHING ever made. :mad:

This cannot stand as written. Can't wait for this to be tested in court.
 
Also Garands don’t have a detachable mag. Unless the state names them on the evil roster, it can’t be an AW even with a pistol grip and threaded barrel.
I would go as far as to say that an enbloc could easily be construed as a 'detachable feeding device'.
Possibly even stripper clips if the definition really gets stretched...
 
Crazy, isn't it. [laugh] What a bizarre, screwed-up state we live in. 🤪
At reptile prices… it was definitely never a thing.
For that kind of money, you could’ve gotten something more legit.

We just have to wait and see how it plays out…
The Healy thing was never real. They’re just giving her a cover. She’s gonna be the vice president to Kamala… from what I’m here and it’s gonna be a two women ticket with one of them not being white lesbian and a person of color…..

It’s really sad when you think about it I have nothing against lesbians or people of color. I just don’t like this lesbian or people of color.

It’s not their color, pronouns, sexual orientation. It’s the fact that these people are f***ing stupid.
 
Seems like a nice guy. Doesn't get it though. Voting in MA to fix this shit? As he said himself 50+ years of MA shitting on 2A.
Toby is a good guy. His heart is in the right place. He has walked the walk and talked the talk fighting anti-2A oppression in this awful state and elsewhere. I would even argue that his YouTube broadcasts, giving testimony, running for political office, etc. have been more effective overall in getting the word out than what anyone at GOAL has been able to do.

But yes, he is wrong on thinking voting can solve this gun law crisis. Voting in MA is useless. Only the courts can fix this now... most likely the US Supreme Court.
 
He’s a complete f***tard. I’m not saying it’s wrong but voting anybody out or basically everything else he saying this f***ing stupid.

Just go about your business if shit goes sideways keep your mouth shut. Get a lawyer dig your heels in and see what happens.

I have the luxury of the ATF approving everything I’ve ever done and everything I bought was from a gun store so I really don’t understand how it’s going to affect me and that’s not the problem. It’s people younger than us who are really getting f***ing ass raped squeal piggy


View: https://youtu.be/9gLN3QoN-q8?si=tIHudXY9mz83sT5Y


This thing is so poorly f***ing written it’s gonna go to court and at least some of it’s gonna go ..

And then in 10 years, we can start the fight all over again

We all knew it was gonna get worse after the Supreme Court gave them a bitch slap. it’s just like the Supreme Court telling Biden he can’t forgive student debt, but he does it anyway and now we need term limits on the Supreme Court cause they don’t like the way the games played just keep moving the goalposts…

We need to term limits on the politicians. It’s one branch of politics, trying to take over the other.


You need to apply the happy ending.

...and then the suit went to the highest court there is and the verdict was, naaaaaaaahhhhh.
 
Toby is a good guy. His heart is in the right place. He has walked the walk and talked the talk fighting anti-2A oppression in this awful state and elsewhere. I would even argue that his YouTube broadcasts, giving testimony, running for political office, etc. have been more effective overall in getting the word out than what anyone at GOAL has been able to do.

But yes, he is wrong on thinking voting can solve this gun law crisis. Voting in MA is useless. Only the courts can fix this now... most likely the US Supreme Court.
And it's one hell of an "if" if SCOTUS even bothers. And if they do whose to say the country will follow it? Plenty of government officials are 100% ok with publicly ignoring Bruen.

Lines are being drawn in the sand. The country is forcing itself to Balkanize. Don't be on the wrong side of the fence.
 
we really need is Trump to appoint more Supreme Court justices…
No wonder why the executive branch wants to limit the other branch. Because the bitch slap is coming
 
She is definitely signing it. Just setting up the venue and arranging the moms demand action and CNN crew to show up.

If it gets overturned in 3 years they’ll come up with something else. Never stopped Brandon from student loan “forgiveness” bribes.
They play the long game, gun owners play defense. They put this POS bill forth knowing that parts of to won't survive scrutiny. They also know it will probably be multiple years until it winds it way through the courts. They will then do some rewording alphabet soup mumbo jumbo and do it again.

Rinse and repeat.

The long game...
 
I would go as far as to say that an enbloc could easily be construed as a 'detachable feeding device'.
Possibly even stripper clips if the definition really gets stretched...
Thankfully I don’t think the feeding device definition has changed so if it wasn’t considered detachable before, it won’t be now.
 
And it's one hell of an "if" if SCOTUS even bothers. And if they do whose to say the country will follow it? Plenty of government officials are 100% ok with publicly ignoring Bruen.

Lines are being drawn in the sand. The country is forcing itself to Balkanize. Don't be on the wrong side of the fence.
Clearly, I am currently living on the wrong side of the fence. When the battle lines are drawn, I'll have to either move or go underground. 🥷
 
Until they put those retro rifles on the banned rifle list right? I just keep thinking everyone is going nuts trying to interpret “shroud” etc and it’s all moot if they just add everything to the banned list they are gonna come up with.

I’m afraid anything banned won’t be allowed to be transferred in. Closed market unless your a dualie.

SECTION 71. Assault Style Firearms
• Sets two grandfathering dates that conflict with the date in the new definition of “Assault Style Firearm”.
o August 1, 2024 Assault Style Firearms and Large Capacity Feeding Devices - bans: possess, own, offer for sale, sell or otherwise transfer in the commonwealth or import into the commonwealth that was not lawfully possessed in the state prior to August 2, 2024.
 
Football season will be here soon.
The "patriot" fans will be mobbing a stadium to watch a sub-par team play game after game.
And many of those fans that are firearm enthusiast will be amongst that crowd.
But sadly, it's tough to fill a few blocks at a rally in Boston denouncing Healey and her radical gun laws. Perhaps the pro 2a lawyers will get this fixed. But that's going to take years.
 
Being a libertarian is like being Switzerland or old-skool Sweden: sure, you're neutral. But you can't expect other nations to respect that neutrality. It's on you to secure your own neutrality by maintaining a strong army and setting up fortresses that can defend your borders.
I reread that a few times trying to understand what librarians had to do with this lol
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom