MA Gun Grab 2024: H.4885 - Passed legislature, headed to the governor

Status
Not open for further replies.
Seriously. If you understand taxes you understand that the amount you get back from charitable contributions is very small. The Trump Tax cuts put real cash in middle class Americans pockets.

Trump’s tax re-write he signed was anything but a cut for anybody who owned a house in a high cost of living area. Including lots of middle class. Basically it was specifically designed as a slap to blue states. Especially with the structure change about to happen that they built into it.
 
I would love for someone to post here when the NRA talks about what is going on in MA in one of their magazines or whatever they send people now.

I am serious, I want to see what they have to say about MA. It seems they always talk about other States.
 
After Biden got elected, I noticed some ominous changes at the VA, one of them was the nurse who is very familiar with and liked very much and she was 100% veteran and 100% a Trump supporter. I found out sometime later she was terminated and then later the story changed, "oh she cut herself". The mostly female staff staff really we're not the veteran friendly anymore. I was friends with the senior Doctor in the unit and he was pretty candid about what was going on.
 
Reading the GOAL summary of the "greatly expanded" Red Flag laws is jaw dropping. Who can file, basically anyone. This is where 'the man' gets an uninvited Mass State pass to enter into your house without a warrant search and seize all your firearms enter your house and look for non-compliance. I could tell you from hard experience that the court is willing to accept anything that the PoPo say is non-compliant, and you will be charged accordingly. In my case a .17HMR Volquartsen target rifle was quoted in court to be an assault rifle. I encourage you all to read the GOAL Red Flag summary very carefully.


Ugh... The GOAL summary s disingenuous and misleading. I'm not going to defend the addition of all the new people who can red-flag you, but this part is really important:

the actual bill said:
...a provider who has provided health care services to the respondent within the preceding 6 months;

It's not "basically anyone", it's limited to the same people as before, with the addition of a bunch of heath care people WHO HAVE TREATED YOU WITHIN SIX MONTHS

It's line 176, under the definition of "petitioner".

EDIT:

Also, I can't find anything in current law, the bill, or any of the amendments adding school principals, college administrators, or employers to the list of possible "petitioners" If that's in there somewhere, a reference would be really useful.

EDIT 2:

I'm talking about the SENATE bill, S.2572, not the House bill, HD.4607. The GOAL link above is about the House bill.
 
Last edited:
If people spent 1/20th of their time calling/emailing their reps/senators, showing up for hearings or doing something useful other than posting on a forum this may have had a slight chance of not moving forward. Going online and ranting about it after the fact does absolutely nothing other than make people feel better.

You reap what you sow.....................
Says the guy criticizing people who post on a forum by posting on a forum...
 
The LinkedIn Pedophile contacted Jean Carroll and recruited her to file a false claim against Trump. Trump was found responsible in a civil trial without one shred of evidence except you look like a witch. Trump is now red flagged.

Anti-gun people view red flag accusations as just a way to enhance gun bans.....see....we never banned guns....just the person.

Massachusetts greatly expanding the prohibited rules to reach back and deny 2A rights is just simply a different version of red flag laws.

It's an insidious perversion of taking away peoples rights and freedoms.....but its what Leftists do.
 
EDIT 2:

I'm talking about the SENATE bill, S.2572, not the House bill, HD.4607. The GOAL link above is about the House bill.
The senate bill was passed as an amendment to the house bill, so the number both chambers are using going forward from here reverts to the house number.
 
View attachment 846107


Not sure how long you've lived in MA, or if you've ever voted here... the state is practically 100% run by progressive leftist Dims.. They'll do what they want, bicker a bit over details about the size of the dildo they want to ram up your ass, but in the end, bend over and lube up.. because you're getting something shoved up there..

and no amount of complaining, lobbying, calling, emailing, etc is gonna have any f***ing effect on it.. So..

View attachment 846107


Not sure how long you've lived in MA, or if you've ever voted here... the state is practically 100% run by progressive leftist Dims.. They'll do what they want, bicker a bit over details about the size of the dildo they want to ram up your ass, but in the end, bend over and lube up.. because you're getting something shoved up there..

and no amount of complaining, lobbying, calling, emailing, etc is gonna have any f***ing effect on it.. So..

View attachment 846107


Not sure how long you've lived in MA, or if you've ever voted here... the state is practically 100% run by progressive leftist Dims.. They'll do what they want, bicker a bit over details about the size of the dildo they want to ram up your ass, but in the end, bend over and lube up.. because you're getting something shoved up there..

and no amount of complaining, lobbying, calling, emailing, etc is gonna have any f***ing effect on it.. So..

View attachment 846108

View attachment 846107


Not sure how long you've lived in MA, or if you've ever voted here... the state is practically 100% run by progressive leftist Dims.. They'll do what they want, bicker a bit over details about the size of the dildo they want to ram up your ass, but in the end, bend over and lube up.. because you're getting something shoved up there..

and no amount of complaining, lobbying, calling, emailing, etc is gonna have any f***ing effect on it.. So..

View attachment 846108

View: https://youtu.be/HjPgdhRsGIQ?si=37aGMNPgXxKCu9YI
 
Last edited:
Ugh... The GOAL summary s disingenuous and misleading. I'm not going to defend the addition of all the new people who can red-flag you, but this part is really important:



It's not "basically anyone", it's limited to the same people as before, with the addition of a bunch of heath care people WHO HAVE TREATED YOU WITHIN SIX MONTHS

It's line 176, under the definition of "petitioner".

EDIT:

Also, I can't find anything in current law, the bill, or any of the amendments adding school principals, college administrators, or employers to the list of possible "petitioners" If that's in there somewhere, a reference would be really useful.

EDIT 2:

I'm talking about the SENATE bill, S.2572, not the House bill, HD.4607. The GOAL link above is about the House bill.
iANAL....lol
 
Anti-gun people view red flag accusations as just a way to enhance gun bans.....see....we never banned guns....just the person.

Massachusetts greatly expanding the prohibited rules to reach back and deny 2A rights is just simply a different version of red flag laws.

It's an insidious perversion of taking away peoples rights and freedoms.....but its what Leftists do.

And speaking of the Constitutional civil right to defend your home and family.......

1706983854413.png
 
The senate bill was passed as an amendment to the house bill, so the number both chambers are using going forward from here reverts to the house number.

Indeed. That doesn’t change the fact that the GOAL link doesn’t apply to anything in current law, the Senate bill, or any of its amendments. It’s left over from the original House bill.

It would be really helpful to those of us who want to read the actual text to have references in addition to the summary.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom