I think what he means is, the justices already know what the ruling will be, They need to use Bruen and Heller to come to those conclusions. And their not going to contradict their own previous decisionsWhat does this mean?
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/Pioneer Valley Arms April Giveaway ***Smith & Wesson SD9VE 9MM***
I think what he means is, the justices already know what the ruling will be, They need to use Bruen and Heller to come to those conclusions. And their not going to contradict their own previous decisionsWhat does this mean?
Freudian slip?
This is a copium based opinion, but maybe the court is aware of what typically happens when major 2A bills or cases start getting strong traction and were waiting for the Trump nominees to get confirmed for certain agency directors as those are usually where toys get wound up.From their standpoint, there's no real rush. And there are several relevant cases in the pipeline; having waited this long, they might be wondering what's going to happen with some of those.
It's a pain in the ass for us, though I don't really expect the justices to care much about that.
Employing the methodology announced in New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v. Bruen, 597 U.S. 1 (2022), the en banc court concluded that California’s law comported with the Second Amendment for two independent reasons. First, the text of the Second Amendment does not encompass the right to possess large-capacity magazines because large-capacity magazines are neither “arms” nor protected accessories. Second, even assuming that the text of the Second Amendment...
Zero surprise from the 9th.
View: https://x.com/gunpolicy/status/1902772872013029565
Discuss the opinion here:
The Opinion:
Employing the methodology announced in New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v. Bruen, 597 U.S. 1 (2022), the en banc court concluded that California’s law comported with the Second Amendment for two independent reasons. First, the text of the Second Amendment does not encompass the right to possess large-capacity magazines because large-capacity magazines are neither “arms” nor protected accessories. Second, even assuming that the text of the Second Amendment...
- sbhaven
- Replies: 22
- Forum: General Discussion
Employing the methodology announced in New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v. Bruen, 597 U.S. 1 (2022), the en banc court concluded that California’s law comported with the Second Amendment for two independent reasons. First, the text of the Second Amendment does not encompass the right to possess large-capacity magazines because large-capacity magazines are neither “arms” nor protected accessories. Second, even assuming that the text of the Second Amendment...
I liked the manner he emptied his satchel full of ‘accessories’ on the desk, like a boy shows his buddy his GI Joe collection.Judge owns an arsenal![]()
And a bunch of P320s, which might be why he wants to protect automatics!Judge owns an arsenal![]()
I certainly hope you're right.I think this what the courts has been waiting for….. expect good news on Monday
Video was posted to the earlier discussion thread...
The Opinion:
Employing the methodology announced in New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v. Bruen, 597 U.S. 1 (2022), the en banc court concluded that California’s law comported with the Second Amendment for two independent reasons. First, the text of the Second Amendment does not encompass the right to possess large-capacity magazines because large-capacity magazines are neither “arms” nor protected accessories. Second, even assuming that the text of the Second Amendment...
- sbhaven
- Replies: 22
- Forum: General Discussion
Agreed.I think this what the courts has been waiting for…..
I expect no news tomorrow. It’ll take time for a cert petition from the 9th and to agree to rule on both magazine cases.expect good news on Monday
I want this guy on the Supreme Court ASAP!
Is "Ocean State/RI" a part of this?
Does anyone have a good summary of this? Maybe 3-5 sentences to send out to 1500 club members. Just a high level overview. Thanks.
He handled those gun better than a lot of folks I stood next too on the range! Now how do we get him on the SCOTUS?
View: https://x.com/gunpolicy/status/1902772872013029565
Discuss the opinion here:
The Opinion:
Employing the methodology announced in New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v. Bruen, 597 U.S. 1 (2022), the en banc court concluded that California’s law comported with the Second Amendment for two independent reasons. First, the text of the Second Amendment does not encompass the right to possess large-capacity magazines because large-capacity magazines are neither “arms” nor protected accessories. Second, even assuming that the text of the Second Amendment...
- sbhaven
- Replies: 22
- Forum: General Discussion
And Diane Fine-Stine. LOL
A magazine is not an accessory.
Okay, let's go with that. If it's not an accessory then it must be considered as part of the firearm itself, because without a magazine the firearm can't be used for it's intended purpose.
I suppose you could always load a single round at a time into an AR, but that's not how the rifle was designed to operate.
Maybe I'm stupid because this ruling makes no sense to me. It's like saying a car is still a car even if it has no fuel tank.
Or no wheels!A magazine is not an accessory.
Okay, let's go with that. If it's not an accessory then it must be considered as part of the firearm itself, because without a magazine the firearm can't be used for it's intended purpose.
I suppose you could always load a single round at a time into an AR, but that's not how the rifle was designed to operate.
Maybe I'm stupid because this ruling makes no sense to me. It's like saying a car is still a car even if it has no fuel tank.