More correctly, one that you implied and, when confronted, are now trying to deny that you raised.
Defining "that a particular point" is a bit of a trick Collapsing a somewhat disjointed paragraph in your post #265 to the salient points results in the following:
"[C]it[ing] an example of a rifle not on [a] list ..... as being as effective as an AR15, is .... not at all part of the debate about whether assault weapons are more dangerous than any firearm not on the list."
That's a rather remarkable lack of internal consistency. I can see why you've decided that you're not defending it.
It's remarkable how often people unable to articulate their position in a clear, consistent, straightforward manner can think of no response other than to resort to insult when called on it. Huh.