Mark from MA
NES Member
- Joined
- Jun 4, 2008
- Messages
- 11,644
- Likes
- 11,865
Makes complete sense, thanks a lot for the reply brother
#1 and #2 and #4 are nothing burgers to a BUYER........and confuse a lot of buyers and newbies by the term non-compliant. #4 is especially gay because there is no written law to cover it and the theory is if it does go to court it would be tossed because you can't charge someone with breaking verbal mouth garbage, that has not gone thru the correct constitutional process of becoming a law.There are four types of non-compliant:
- Not on one of the EOPS handgun rosters (crime for dealer to sell)
- Not on the AG's non-list (act of consumer fraud for the dealer to sell)
- Not compliant with the MA AW and not pre-ban
- Not compliant with the AG's edict (claimed to be a crime by the AG, not tested in court)
That said, its had its intended effect, as threats from government to people who generally are law abiding try and comply. Id say a good 95 percent of dealers comply with it. And as the term pre-healy came from it……a lot of pantsshitting was and still is being done over it.
#3 is the only thing rational to even care about, the AWB, and post ban standard capacity mags and has written law to back it up making possession of them by the BUYER (if not an LEO) a felony. Though its very rarely if ever been used in a straight gun purchase/transfer that I know of. But technically could be backttracked thru either the Federal database if so desired. It could also be backtracked thru FA-10 if dealer uses that system at point of sale.
We all know how much of a shit show that FA-10 database is though, and if the legitimacy of transactions and what people own are challenged on it (guns never disposed of properly, we still own every gun we bought that we have traded to a dealer outside of the state) ......it would be laughed out of court.
Last edited: