Jsfitzgerald85
NES Member
Ya, that’s it. Pretty much exactly what they told me word for word if I remember. They probably got asked this question so much they resorted to copy and pasting the answer
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Ya, that’s it. Pretty much exactly what they told me word for word if I remember. They probably got asked this question so much they resorted to copy and pasting the answer
I am quite sure that it is too late for them to add an emergency preamble. So the law will not kick in for another 90 days. This basically means that frame transfers, ammo sales, etc, will all remain legal. Moreover, everything that is not an assault style weapon (under the upcoming definition), can still be bought for another 90 days, for example Beretta 1301 or A300. As these are not assault style, they don't have to be registered by Aug 1. So guys, don't shit your pants.
Pre 68 are exemptI only have one .22lr from the early 60's a bolt action remington that is only worth about $50 was waiting for a buy back to get more for it LOL, I will have to read the bill closer to see if pre-68 .22's need a SN
Also, pre-1968 guns are exempt on line 484 of the billIt doesn't if you don't plan on complying
CorrectCorrect me if I'm wrong, but if you currently have a frame for an off-roster handgun, you can build it and register (whatever that means under the new law) after 8/1, since it's not an AWS. Right?
Yeah - I'm a little salty from the immediate move to hawk Tuah the state through immediate compliance by half the a**h***s around here.Also, pre-1968 guns are exempt on line 484 of the bill
NH shops couldn’t even agree on whether they can sell MA-compliant rifles to MA residents without shipping to an FFL before. Now? Forget it.
One small issue - MA doesn't care what SCOTUS says, as demonstrated by this steaming pile of dogshit. Any of the other AWB cases could reach SCOTUS, be shot down, and MA would still arrest you. Time to spill the tea.This bill is critically important to us, but there are literally hundreds of cases involving civil rights that are just as important to the people involved in those cases nationwide, and only nine people to decide whether or not they're worth hearing. Nothing makes this one particularly special.
SCOTUS has demonstrated repeatedly that they're not interested in granting cert to gun cases that haven't yet percolated up through the appellate levels. They're not likely to make an exception for this law, which is at least consistent.
The good news is that we might not have to wait for this case to reach SCOTUS. Other cases in other circuits are much farther along than this one, and will get to the Supremes within a year or so. Those rulings are likely to have a profound effect on certain aspects of this law, too.
It has to go through the 1st Circus and that's by far the worst circuit by far for 2a casesI’m wondering if there is any kind of streamlining of the process of getting this in front of SCOTUS given that it has the potential of being a complete ban on RKBA for 18-21 year olds. After all, they’re not allowed to own handguns so if FFLs are also prohibited from selling them rifles or shotguns…
Yeah - I'm a little salty from the immediate move to hawk Tuah the state through immediate compliance by half the a**h***s around here.
One small issue - MA doesn't care what SCOTUS says, as demonstrated by this steaming pile of dogshit. Any of the other AWB cases could reach SCOTUS, be shot down, and MA would still arrest you. Time to spill the tea.
It amazes me that state after state see dismal, single digit percentage compliance rates... but in MA, of all places, the sheep are lining up to comply. I think we'll have significantly higher compliance rates than places like NY, NJ, IL, CT, etc.Yeah - I'm a little salty from the immediate move to hawk Tuah the state through immediate compliance by half the a**h***s around here.
It amazes me that state after state see dismal, single digit percentage compliance rates... but in MA, of all places, the sheep are lining up to comply. I think we'll have significantly higher compliance rates than places like NY, NJ, IL, CT, etc.
Which is sadIt amazes me that state after state see dismal, single digit percentage compliance rates... but in MA, of all places, the sheep are lining up to comply. I think we'll have significantly higher compliance rates than places like NY, NJ, IL, CT, etc.
I thinks part of the equation in MA is the “registration” system already in place. They already know what most have, vs the other states where there’s rough statistics but no individual data. This skews the compliance curve.It amazes me that state after state see dismal, single digit percentage compliance rates... but in MA, of all places, the sheep are lining up to comply. I think we'll have significantly higher compliance rates than places like NY, NJ, IL, CT, etc.
"But will I be allowed to sell a magazine?!?!?!"To be fair, I don't think any of those other states had a transaction system like MA does?
I suspect people here are not going to want to register, but they might feel sketchy about registering nothing when the state knows damn well what they have already. I would understand someone who complied because of that; they feel they already have registered, and in a way? They have. The state has them by the balls.
What I don't understand are posters saying things like, "I have this old gun from my grandpa that's not EFA-10'd. Where do I register it????" Well, shithead, you don't register it.
Damn, everyone’s rushing to comply just as fast as they signed up for the covid vax.
They don't know jack! When the data got leaked I found myself easily - there were guns registered to me that I didn't have and I had guns that were missing registrations. It's a garbage system.I thinks part of the equation in MA is the “registration” system already in place. They already know what most have, vs the other states where there’s rough statistics but no individual data. This skews the compliance curve.
They were right, registration leads to ………..
The media is reporting that all assault weapon and high cap magazines are now not leagle to possess sell or transfer. That all non-serilesed firearms are ilegal and 3d printers and cnc machines are now ileagle to own unless you are licensed to manufacture guns.
To be fair, I don't think any of those other states had a transaction system like MA does?
I suspect people here are not going to want to register, but they might feel sketchy about registering nothing when the state knows damn well what they have already. I would understand someone who complied because of that; they feel they already have registered, and in a way? They have. The state has them by the balls.
What I don't understand are posters saying things like, "I have this old gun from my grandpa that's not EFA-10'd. Where do I register it????" Well, shithead, you don't register it.
The way I see it going down: “ Attn firearms license holder, our records indicate that firearms attached to your name have not been registered in the new state registration portal. Failure to register these firearms will result in the suspension and forfeiture of your LTC. This is your only notification on this matter…….blah blah penalty of law blah blah blah..
Build what you want and shutup about it.Really wish I had bought all the parts I need to build the couple AR's I got stripped lowers for a while back. Never got around to getting any of the parts. Certainly don't have time to get parts, build (which I've never done before, this was going to be my first), serial and fa10 before the 1st
I hope they bend over every box a year FUD and don't change a damn thing.It will be interesting to see when the Mass Wildlife Director and Board will make “emergency” changes in their own regs. And those changes have a shelf life of 90 days, which means they have time to have something ready for October 1st.
The bill had every opportunity to change language around “chambered in” or “use of” and add bolt action, prohibit semiautomatic, etc but did not.
There are only about 60,000 licensed hunters in the state, which is what, ~1% of the population? But it generates quite a bit of $$ for the state.
I’m slightly optimistic that this confusion may be what’s needed to accelerate where this ends up.
Build what you want and shutup about it.