Nightshift
NES Member
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2020
- Messages
- 751
- Likes
- 1,896
Copies and duplicates were not defined in the federal AWB - however case law limited the interpretation to the enumerated manufacturer changing a model number but leaving the firearm substantially the same as a copy or duplicate. This allowed the compliant versions to be sold by other manufacturers since they weren't enumerated nor did they fail the featured tests.
Healy's declaration tossed 22 years of case law out the window by saying all of that was wrong and copies or duplicates referred to similar versions made by other manufacturers also AND that there was no cure for being an AW by deleting features.
So from 2016 until today there was an assertion from the state that all post 94 AR platform rifles (and any enumerated firearm in general) was an AW. However that assertion was never used as a primary charge in order to avoid giving standing to fight the declaration in court.
On short there is no mass law before/after 2016 - the is now post 7/25/2024 but 2016 had no real legal impact even of it did cause massive shift in how a lot of FFLs operate.
Thank you. That was an explanation that kinda makes sense. Not the “I looked it up in 4 seconds BS”.