Trump and 2A

Well what choice do I have? Republicans who literally suck or democrats who are drunk with Bloomberg anti-gun cash? At least I know I am not voting for more national debt.

Don’t worry about his opinion.



 
If she lives in MA her presidential vote doesn't count anyways. So it's purely cosmetic as far as non moonbats are concerned.
And a third party garnering a certain % of votes changes the requirements for them to get on the ballot next time, in many states, and may affect national pressure to include them in debates (if we ever have real debates again).
 
The the $5000 a year. increase in auto/home/health insurance in the last 3 weeks on top of the increases in 2023 just suck .
Where scratching out heads on wjere that $500 more a month is coming from .

Any how like I said everything needs to return back to pre covid coats

Retirement is almost nom exsistent for me
The little I was putting into my IRA was absorbed in the early part of this mess.

I dint see the costs dropping 20% or more
Anytime soon . 2nd job is most likely the next step
I apologize. I saw the acronym and misread what you were writing. I believe once fuel starts coming down, the cost of goods follows. Trumps not even president yet and good things are starting to happen.
 
Lol, look at this BS they sell their members. Too funny:


Pushing a dangerous law that would force all 50 states to allow violent criminals, domestic abusers, and even convicted stalkers to carry hidden, loaded guns in public.

Someone tell them they forgot "racist white NES members".
 
Lol, look at this BS they sell their members. Too funny:




Someone tell them they forgot "racist white NES members".
They push total BS.

If it follows past initiatives, you would still be subject to they states restrictions, and of course Fed restrictions. For example, someone with a NH P&R could carry in MA but would still have to follow the 10 round limit.

It's not going to allow convicted felons or those with a RO to carry.
 
Man if national reciprocity goes through there gonna be a lot of crow served around here….

With this election in particular, voting against republicans cause of gun rights is kinda like voting against them for “women’s medical rights”
Sometimes you gotta hold your nose and vote for country not party or personal ideals
 
Does it not add to the popular vote ? I know it’s not the Metric of our electoral system but it’s absolutely a message to be heard.
It's basically meaningless outside of what @strangenh mentioned about the alternative candidates.

Sure, it might make a difference in a dead EV tie, but that basically never happens.
 
They push total BS.

If it follows past initiatives, you would still be subject to they states restrictions, and of course Fed restrictions. For example, someone with a NH P&R could carry in MA but would still have to follow the 10 round limit.

It's not going to allow convicted felons or those with a RO to carry.
But their followers (low info voters) will lap up their lies. They are true believers and will lobby hard against it . . . and many legistraitors will also believe the lies and vote accordingly.
 
More gun control happened under Trump than under obamination and dementia Joe combined

Bump stock ban and Trump said "take their guns first, due process 2nd." He will not hesitate to throw us under the bus again.

The only value Trump gave us was good, but far from perfect, Supreme Court justices
Keep in mind, Red Flag laws sound awesome on the surface. Woman in danger, take the guns, figure it out.

What people who aren't into guns don't understand is the bonding process or the costs. I don't know the daily rate for a gun, but if you have 10 of them, it's 10xratexdays, which adds up quickly. If we are ever in the minority again, which may (WILL) happen, so at least listen to this, there needs to be a stipulation that the seizing agency has to cover the costs until determination if a Red Flag law is passed. If it is adjudicated in favor of the defendant, the claimant needs to pay for the guns' storage, and the guns released immediately even if the claimant doesn't pay right away. Legitimate cases will still be brought forward, sham ones will at least feel the sting.

If it's GOING to pass, jam that little bit in there. Best time to think about defense is when you don't need it.
 
But their followers (low info voters) will lap up their lies. They are true believers and will lobby hard against it . . . and many legistraitors will also believe the lies and vote accordingly.
Sadly, I believe you are correct.
 
Back
Top Bottom