Description in captionI see missing primers in there
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/Pioneer Valley Arms February Giveaway ***Smith & Wesson SD9VE 9MM***
Description in captionI see missing primers in there
This is NES. No read. Just shitpost.Description in caption
Be careful with tite group. It gets spikey with top end loadsShot practice plates last night brought the 629. The 240 grain cswc with 9.6 grains titegroup is a stout load! I still need to run this load through a chrono and see what the actual velocity is but they hammer the steel plates and the recoil DEFINITELY let's you know your shooting a 44 mag. I was worried about this load as it's a fast powder and I've been told it's a terrible powder for 44 mag. The spent case primers don't look any different than factory 44mag. They are a little "stickier" to eject than factory or other loads I've made but I can eject them with a hard slap with my hand.
Have to use cast projos with this load but 9.6 titegroup and a 240 cast projo is a hell of an economic 44 mag recipe.
Yup I've heard that and that's why I was worried using it and why I checked the spent cases for over pressure signs. I'm not at the top of the load data for that recipe and have no plans to increase that charge. Got the data from hodgedon website. Max is 10 and I worked it up from 7. I weigh my charges when making this load as well to make sure.Be careful with tite group. It gets spikey with top end loads
Do you have any other powders to work with? Something much slower could get the same results without sticky extraction.Yup I've heard that and that's why I was worried using it and why I checked the spent cases for over pressure signs. I'm not at the top of the load data for that recipe and have no plans to increase that charge. Got the data from hodgedon website. Max is 10 and I worked it up from 7. I weigh my charges when making this load as well to make sure.
I do. H110 but no large mag primers and half a can of 2400 left. The goal was en economical 44 mag for plate banging fun and I think I've achieved it. Even at the 9 dollar per hundred primer prices I'm at about $15.50 per 50 round box making these. I've decided when I use up the last of these I'm going to drop the powder charge from 9.6 to about 9 just to be on the safe side. Max charge is 10 according to hodgedonDo you have any other powders to work with? Something much slower could get the same results without sticky extraction.
That’s a very good idea. If you just looking to make some noise, the steel pretty much sounds the same wether its getting hit at 800 ft./s or 1000 ft./s.I do. H110 but no large mag primers and half a can of 2400 left. The goal was en economical 44 mag for plate banging fun and I think I've achieved it. Even at the 9 dollar per hundred primer prices I'm at about $15.50 per 50 round box making these. I've decided when I use up the last of these I'm going to drop the powder charge from 9.6 to about 9 just to be on the safe side. Max charge is 10 according to hodgedon
View attachment 755652
240 grain cswc 9 grains titegroup averaged 1126 fps much faster than I anticipated.
240 grain jsp with 19.5 grains 2400 averaged 1104 fps.
I guess my biggest "win' with this testing is finding a solid magnum load using titegroup.....(1100 fps isnt a barn burner for velocity but its no slouch) for cost saving purposes. Alot of my research has people shitting on titegroup for 44 mag because it's a fast powder usually reserved for non magnum target loads. It's supposedly not position sensitive either so the low volume in the big case isn't an issue. Even my deviation in velocity one round to the next was decent......35 fps deviation.A little surprising but not a lot considering that this is JSP versus CSWC. With the same bullets, I predict 2400 beats Titegroup for velocity in the 4 incher, but not by a lot. The marginal velocity increase given by slower powders in my revolvers is one reason I prefer moderate burn-rate pistol powders for my magnum handguns and relegate the slower powders to carbines. In the handguns, the slower powder creates a lot more flash, recoil, and (probably) forcing cone wear than it does velocity. I guess if I were hunting with a handgun, I might care more about the velocity, but your Titegroup load is probably pretty easy on the gun. Sure, there's magnum pressure in the chambers, but you're not blow-torching your forcing cone.
Makes sense. If I'm understanding what Gordon's Reloading Tool is telling me, the powder is completely burned at about the same time as the base of the bullet exits the brass.It's supposedly not position sensitive either so the low volume in the big case isn't an issue. Even my deviation in velocity one round to the next was decent......35 fps deviation.
Check the burn rate chartSome interesting results on my chrono today!
First the 44 mag cast 240 with 9 grains titegroup empty cases came out smooth no sticking.
Test gun 4 inch model 629
240 grain cswc 9 grains titegroup averaged 1126 fps much faster than I anticipated.
240 grain jsp with 19.5 grains 2400 averaged 1104 fps.
Interesting......I'm getting about the same velocity with the titegroup over 2400 with less than half the powder charge and it's nowhere near max charge. I know it's not the same projo cast vs jacketed. For curiosity sake I'll have to make up some cast 240 with 2400 and see what the velocity change is.....if any. I'll stick with 9 grains tg for this extremely economical load for ringing plates and whacking bowling pins.
The 2400 at 19.5 with a 240 jsp thru the ruger carbine I averages 1564 fps. That's a good deer load right there!
The 45acp using 4.5 grains tg and a 200 grain lswc I average 761 fps. Using 5 grains I was at 876 so that was a bit hot for plate bangers.
I've never had a problem on my LnL priming. The one frustrating thing was the guide rod would come off the bottom plate...so I just printed a new plastic piece at the top to stop it from moving so much. And if it breaks, I have 2 more that I printed. This one is on round 5000 right nowSwitched over the Hornady AP from 223 to 9mm. Cranked out 300 124gr RMR FMJFP over 4,3gr of W231. Deprimed and sized another 500 9mm cases. Wet tumbled. While waiting for them to finish, primed 400 cases off press. ( Have given up trying prime on the LNL. Have tried every tip/trick could find - none fixed it for long.)
Wish had your experience. Also had the plastic bracket holding the guide rod break. Bought a printed one from someone here on NES. Once fixed, still could not get it to prime reliably. Was so frustrated gave up trying and switched to using an RCBS bench primer. Can prime 350-400 cases/hr off press. Know the cases are ready to be processed the way the LNL was designed to work for the rest of the steps.I've never had a problem on my LnL priming. The one frustrating thing was the guide rod would come off the bottom plate...so I just printed a new plastic piece at the top to stop it from moving so much. And if it breaks, I have 2 more that I printed. This one is on round 5000 right now
I find putting some liquid soap on the gaskets stops them from leaking. Have to do this each time, works great. I use Armor-All car wash...I picked up a Frankford Arsenal Rotary Tumbler Lite recently for small batches of brass, and got to try it out today. I tossed in some very dirty HXP brass and a few small bags of miscellaneous recently fired casings and let it spin for a few hours. Very happy with the results. Note that this small one doesn't come with pins of a sifting cap, but these items are included in the full size tumbler and the caps are the same size.
View attachment 762413
Tumbling away! I set the tumblers in a boot tray just in case one of the caps isn't sealed tight.
View attachment 762414
Size comparison between the 7-liter and the Lite.
View attachment 762415
That dirty CMP .30-06 HXP brass is looking pretty good!