How does that one go ?Sounds like the dog owner fully understands the situation better then many posters here.
“Meattey said she understands the shooter was within his rights to shoot the dog but she alleges that he didn't own up to the incident and notify the authorities after it occurred.”
That sounds exactly reasonable. Duck owner was completely justified in shooting the dog. Duck owner was also a loser if as the dog owner claims, not only didn’t own up to it but actually initially lied about it. That’s a scumbag move despite a justified shooting.
Reasonable assumption based on the fact the owner claims the shooter not only didn’t own up to it but lied about it. And when a reporter asked the shooter, he wouldn’t answer. Did you read the article or are you basing your opinions, ironically, based on even less?
Never invite the man into your life.
You know what would have happened if he did the right thing and reported it.
"Sorry we measured the shot at 499 ' 6" from the nearest road, we'll be taking your permit and guns now."
"Sorry we felt the shot was in an usafe direction , we'll be taking you permit and guns now .
You know the drill in this state.
SSSTFU.