- Joined
- Apr 24, 2005
- Messages
- 47,549
- Likes
- 33,610
This was also probably treated as a highly confidential project with the AG's office, with only attorneys at the highest level and sworn to secrecy knowing it was happening.Do you really expect them to have spies in AGs office?
This was intended and planned as a sneak attack, not honest public service and governance. The AGs office probably remembered the fiasco the EOPS had by asking for public comment on proposed "shooting exhibition regulations" and decided to avoid any pesky public feedback.
I've seen a fortune 500 people keep major product announcement secret until the day the company chose to go public, by limiting info on a "need to know" basis and dealing only with highly trusted people.