![IMG_2699.jpg IMG_2699.jpg](https://www.northeastshooters.com/xen/data/attachments/13/13995-e97fb32bf205cda6002b705e34b6cfd4.jpg?hash=6X-zK_IFza)
1957 Colt Govt
![IMG_2685.jpg IMG_2685.jpg](https://www.northeastshooters.com/xen/data/attachments/13/13994-6d14d96bafe22baa0887d366fd570464.jpg?hash=bRTZa6_iK6)
![IMG_2691.jpg IMG_2691.jpg](https://www.northeastshooters.com/xen/data/attachments/13/13996-d25fcd889c45b6daf524777a55072516.jpg?hash=0l_NiJxFtt)
1962 Colt NM
- reps to the first who can give me the full name of the smith who tuned it
![Smile :) :)](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png)
I use Glocks and love their simplicity and reliability. I also use 1911s, but for a different reason. I feel they are inherently accurate and when someone shoots better, confidence levels increase as such.
Their downside IMHO is they take more training to retain and deploy safely and effectively. Most people don't want to or can't train to the level required for a 1911. I feel that's why Glocks and their rivals are so popular. "Why bother with levers when all you need to do is practice your aim?" is what I was told once.
I once read "The appeal (of the 1911) is strong and romantic. Picking up the pistol feels like shaking hands with John Wayne." I couldn't agree more.