If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
No such animal as pre 94 now.pre 94 rifles can have all the evil features heard it was extended to pre 8-1 guns?
thar means i can have folding stocks and bayonet lugs on my guns?No such animal as pre 94 now.
It was either here on 8/1 or it must meet the ban.
If it was here on 8/1, it's exempt.
If they were in the state legally on 8/1, you can have a vibrating dildo flash hider if that's your thing.thar means i can have folding stocks and bayonet lugs on my guns?
depends on where they were ON 8/1. If they were in Maine ON 8/1 then they are illegal. If they were still in MA on 8/1 then they are fine. The point is, the law says ON 8/1, not before and not on or before, just ON. So while you might have bought it 10 years ago, if it was with you on vacation in NH ON 8/1, it is not grandfathered.So if they were in the state on 7/31 they’re illegal?…
No, there is no functioning registration system right now and we will not be required to have all firearms in our possession registered until 1 year after the system is available.What about lowers that were bought and never built? When they are built up into functioning rifles or pistols, are they required by law to be FA-10’d still?
?? Doesn’t the current efa-10 system allow for recording of firearms that are now assembled (prior purchased as pistol frame/rifle lower for ex) and can fire a shot? That was the law prior and currently no?No, there is no functioning registration system right now and we will not be required to have all firearms in our possession registered until 1 year after the system is available.
You can volunteer to register using the EFA-10 system but that's not required per the letter of the law.
Damn... now I need to buy another lowerFor inquiring minds
Gun legal - mag a no-no
Yes and that's why I said you can volunteer to register through that system.?? Doesn’t the current efa-10 system allow for recording of firearms that are now assembled (prior purchased as pistol frame/rifle lower for ex) and can fire a shot? That was the law prior and currently no?
What if I was at the border with NH, half the rifle was in MA and half in NH.depends on where they were ON 8/1. If they were in Maine ON 8/1 then they are illegal. If they were still in MA on 8/1 then they are fine. The point is, the law says ON 8/1, not before and not on or before, just ON. So while you might have bought it 10 years ago, if it was with you on vacation in NH ON 8/1, it is not grandfathered.
Good luck to the state to prove this, but that is what the law says
Do you really want to go into the extreme corner case of a pre 7/20/16 AR that was in the EFA-10 database but not in the state on 8/1?This may be the best thread on this subject yet.
Even if you were serious ;-) a mass judge would surely rule that the whole thing needed to be over the border not even 1/1000 of an inch of it in NH. TWhat if I was at the border with NH, half the rifle was in MA and half in NH.
I am guessing if 50.1% percent was in MA then it is legal.
But what if it was exactly 50/50? ... and the percentage is it by length or features?
I am kidding.
Assuming you don't make it into an unregistered NFA item (don't drill out the pin/weld on your 14.5), seems so. pre 8/2 is exempt from ASW ban. There is no language about needing to conform to the prior AWB. It's simply exempt from the ASW ban.Would this also allow no pin/welding and no need for brakes? <----That get expensive if someone has multiple barrels but can only shoot one at a time.
I'll do you one better. All my evil guns were registered via eFA-10s when I lived in MA. I now live in NH and possess a NR LTC. If said guns were with me in MA on 8/1 that would mean that they would be legal to transfer in MA. Words matter and that abortion of a law is full of bad wording!What if I was at the border with NH, half the rifle was in MA and half in NH.
I am guessing if 50.1% percent was in MA then it is legal.
But what if it was exactly 50/50? ... and the percentage is it by length or features?
I am kidding.
If the rifle is exempt then there is no compliance work needed.Would this also allow no pin/welding and no need for brakes? <----That get expensive if someone has multiple barrels but can only shoot one at a time.
There is no such thing as pre 8/2.Assuming you don't make it into an unregistered NFA item (don't drill out the pin/weld on your 14.5), seems so. pre 8/2 is exempt from ASW ban. There is no language about needing to conform to the prior AWB. It's simply exempt from the ASW ban.
I'm not sure that they meant to do it this way, but they did. No refunds!!!
I will give you credit for a decent attempt at trolling.Does GOAL agree with the interpretations offered in this thread?
Do any responsible 2nd Amendment legal analysts/activists?
Can someone post a link to their opinions on the topic?