That would be the only way I'd ever consider solar. Roof mounts look horrible and completely fucck up your roof.My neighbor has a ground setup.
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
That would be the only way I'd ever consider solar. Roof mounts look horrible and completely fucck up your roof.My neighbor has a ground setup.
I installed solar panels for a summer and we destroyed some roofs. 6 guys up on a roof in 90 degree day sliding around on especially steep pitch. look in the guter at the end of the day alot of gravel from shingles not to mention the 100's of holes you are drilling.That would be the only way I'd ever consider solar. Roof mounts look horrible and completely fucck up your roof.
Simple Math- is your monthly loan payment for a system that covers 100% of your electric consumption lower than your monthly bill? Yes? Go ahead. No? Not for you. It is really that simple. The SREC credits you will get every month at just the cherry on the top.
It doesn't need to cover you usage for it to be worth it. What it needs to do is be cheaper per kwh than your current electric. Even if you can't cover your entire usage for various reasons, if the portion you cover works out to be cheaper than what you would pay for the same amount from the electric co, it's worth it.
A properly engineered and installed system doesn't cause any damage to your roof - not that naysayers will believe that but it's true.That would be the only way I'd ever consider solar. Roof mounts look horrible and completely fucck up your roof.
Thankfully the crew that did mine was more considerate and mine was done in the fall - all work done from roof jacks or off the rails as they were installed from the bottom.I installed solar panels for a summer and we destroyed some roofs. 6 guys up on a roof in 90 degree day sliding around on especially steep pitch. look in the guter at the end of the day alot of gravel from shingles not to mention the 100's of holes you are drilling.
Anyone can run PVWatts and do their own estimates - the only real issue is with shading but there are a couple of free phone apps that will show you where your shade is during the year (but you need to get up to at least your gutter line to get an accurate view.Random thoughts:
Never lease. Always buy. Always finance.
Simple Math- is your monthly loan payment for a system that covers 100% of your electric consumption lower than your monthly bill? Yes? Go ahead. No? Not for you. It is really that simple. The SREC credits you will get every month at just the cherry on the top.
about the holes on the roof- yes, there are there, but improperly installed the panels will not compromise your roof.. but will protect the shingles from heat. My attic dropped on average of 7 degrees after the panels were installed. Yes- I monitor the attic temps (among other things)
Seek qualified installer that will guarantee amount of generated energy. Most of them run modeling software that will estimate pretty accurately what a proposed array will make. Bottom line is if you don’t have a southern- facing roof - it ain’t going to work well.
Here is mine- it is a decent size and historical data is available for several years back. If you have questions- ask.
TrinitySolar14490 14.490kW
PVOutput.org - share, compare and monitor live solar photovoltaic output datapvoutput.org
Solar works for me, but everybody needs to do their diligence. The location will absolutely dictate the financial feasibility of the array and don’t let anybody tell you that an eastern or western facing array will produce well. You absolutely need to have a south- facing space for most of the panels.
Which is pretty retarded you would think they would be buying power the same way that like Templeton or whoever is. Those munis out there are cheap AF.Like the windmills Princeton is paying for that don't work......Average Princeton electric bill is over $350 dollars month which is retarded......$30 of it at least every month, towards non functioning windmills on Mt. Wachusett.
You are making it very complicated. Problem is you have no idea how much a kWh produced costs you because you cannot sell it. You get credit for every kWh you export, but it is credit in kWh and not in $ so… go figure.
That is why the math I provided is all that matters in simple terms - if your electric bill is $300 a month and your loan is $250 - that is -all- that matters. The cost of electricity is irrelevant. The amount of energy you produce is irrelevant. The bottom line is relevant (unless you are green and solar energy is your thing). If you are only covering partially what you use the math becomes more complicated and circumstantial. And I am a simple creature and hate complex answers
You are making it very complicated. Problem is you have no idea how much a kWh produced costs you because you cannot sell it. You get credit for every kWh you export, but it is credit in kWh and not in $ so… go figure.
That is why the math I provided is all that matters in simple terms - if your electric bill is $300 a month and your loan is $250 - that is -all- that matters. The cost of electricity is irrelevant. The amount of energy you produce is irrelevant. The bottom line is relevant (unless you are green and solar energy is your thing). If you are only covering partially what you use the math becomes more complicated and circumstantial. And I am a simple creature and hate complex answers
Respectfully, not sure where you're getting that info from, but solar panels only hinder venting the roof during a fire. I'm not aware of any dept that has an SOP of "solar panels=let house burn". It may alter our tactics but at least in my dept we don't give up. If you're running a large amount of lithium-ion batteries for storage, and that's involved..... well that's a different story.Not a big fan of solar.. yet.
Anyone who puts solar on their roof should be aware of one fact that no one wants to talk about. If you have a house fire, they are going to let your house burn, if it is anything more than a small kitchen fire.
Solar, wind and electric cars are all great ideas, but they are not there yet. Obviously, electric cars are the furthest ahead, but they still have a long way to go, mostly due to a lack of charging stations.
Solar is coming, of that I have no doubt, and in the decades to come, with improvements in technology, it will be a very good thing. But if the tech was there, you would not need .gov mandates and incentives. People would clamor to buy the products and pay a premium to get them.
300 years ago, when Franklin patented the wood burning stove, the .gov did not mandate everyone buy a wood stove to save trees. People bought them because it reduced their firewood consumption by 75% and did a better job heating their homes. Prior to the Franklin stove, the best advancement was a fireback.
History has shown that if you want to screw something up, let the government get involved.
We are of very similar mind set. I too had oil with no option to get gas (Eversource wanted about $25k to run gas to my house since there is none on the street) so I opted for a hybrid water heater. Two years ago I also installed a bunch of very high end Fujitsu heat pumps and essentially converted my house to 100% electric. Now my oil consumption is zero unless we drop below -20f where the heat pumps quit and I spent a fraction of what I used to heat the house in the winter.Even when your solar doesn't cover 100% it's easy: if Solar loan + residual is less than your old electric bill you're happy.
I had a spreadsheet that I put all of the production numbers and my residual bill into that tracked to the penny including interest when my breakeven point was.
I've long since stopped updating it because the system was paid for and I saw that I could stop burning a gallon/day of oil for hot water by swapping over to a hybrid water heater and turning off my basement dehumidifier.
Saved about $80-90/month in oil and the water heater used about the same amount of power as the dehumidifier so it was a no-brainer once the math was done with a 2 year break even
I've since swapped out a 13mpg 2004 Ram for (now) a Kona EV with a HF 4x8 trailer - I can move 90% of what I need to move with the trailer and only take an efficiency hit when I need it.
I needed a new vehicle since the RAM's frame rotted out so the cost was really the difference between an ICE that could tow a trailer and the EV (about 12k before rebates at the time and a wash after rebates). I don't count the Ioniq PHEV I had in between since I got more than I paid for it when it was totaled at 3 years and 60k miles.
Not true... October last year I did a huge 24 panel uni-axis ground mount. That would rule out a good percentage of the market.I don't think that is true, it could be a zoning thing which is community/snob specific. I have seen a few in north central MA that are ground mounted - that is the route I think I am going with for the new house. Because of how far I am off the road and wanting to have underground electric, the cost of solar/batteries may not be that much different from connecting to the grid.
Confirmed: definitely not true...I don't think that is true, it could be a zoning thing which is community/snob specific. I have seen a few in north central MA that are ground mounted - that is the route I think I am going with for the new house. Because of how far I am off the road and wanting to have underground electric, the cost of solar/batteries may not be that much different from connecting to the grid.
Your not wrong. I was in Hubbardston and we had National Grid and power was 1/3rd the price. Still high...because MA...my bill averaged 150 a month with no one home, oil fired hot water, and running a little bedroom AC at night sparingly when needed, and a dehumid in the cellar in the summer.Which is pretty retarded you would think they would be buying power the same way that like Templeton or whoever is. Those munis out there are cheap AF.
I just got three quotes from very reputable companies. I asked all three of them...Respectfully, not sure where you're getting that info from, but solar panels only hinder venting the roof during a fire. I'm not aware of any dept that has an SOP of "solar panels=let house burn". It may alter our tactics but at least in my dept we don't give up. If you're running a large amount of lithium-ion batteries for storage, and that's involved..... well that's a different story.
No. The majority of solar systems are grid tied and do not have a battery storage system. A battery system adds tens of thousands of dollars to the install cost.Don't all solar systems use batteries for storage?
If the sun is out, the only way to drop the voltage of a solar panel is to throw a tarp over it.No system installed in at least the last decade doesn't have fireman protection built in that drops the voltage to completely safe levels upon loss of grid connection in a few seconds. That's why my system has a disconnect setup for electric and fire safety.
Residential systems installed in the last 15 years at a minimum have safety circuits built in to drop the array voltage.If the sun is out, the only way to drop the voltage of a solar panel is to throw a tarp over it.
600 volts - DC
Solar Safety for Firefighters: The Myths and the Facts
Most of the renewable energy market is geared towards "grid-tied" systems where the homeowner sells electricity to the utility when there's extra being produced. These systems don't run at benign carwww.lafra.org
If a fire dept is "spraying water" on a roof without solar panels, generally that means the bldg is lost and firefighters are in defensive operations. We wouldn't put water on solar panels because there is no way to turn them off, unless you cover all of them, as the photo receptors are "always on" if they receive light. I imagine everyone can agree that water & electricity is bad juju. Vertical ventilation is done by cutting holes in roofs to allow smoke/gases/heat out while fire suppression is done by putting water one the fire inside (generally). If we're unable to vent vertically because of obstructions or other hazards, horizontal ventilation is done by taking out the windows on the upper floors, closing doors to areas not involved, using hydraulic ventilation by spraying fog streams out the window to pull smoke & gasses out of the area, etc. These are generalities, and while every dept is different, these concepts are probably widely used. And I would agree with one of the other fellas that said most solar systems don't have the storage systems right now, and they are tied to the grid.I just got three quotes from very reputable companies. I asked all three of them...
I have had many fire fighter tell me that they would not, and the reps of every company said they will not spray water on a roof with solar.
Don't all solar systems use batteries for storage?
Captain John McClain - Sharon FD
John Parlatore - Middleboro FD
Jerry Bradbury - Dedham FD
Brien Perkins - Lakeville/ Manchester FD
Chief ( don't know his name ) Bellingham FD
I'm sure you know way more about this subject than I ever will; you sound like you're connected to the fire dept.If a fire dept is "spraying water" on a roof without solar panels, generally that means the bldg is lost and firefighters are in defensive operations. We wouldn't put water on solar panels because there is no way to turn them off, unless you cover all of them, as the photo receptors are "always on" if they receive light. I imagine everyone can agree that water & electricity is bad juju. Vertical ventilation is done by cutting holes in roofs to allow smoke/gases/heat out while fire suppression is done by putting water one the fire inside (generally). If we're unable to vent vertically because of obstructions or other hazards, horizontal ventilation is done by taking out the windows on the upper floors, closing doors to areas not involved, using hydraulic ventilation by spraying fog streams out the window to pull smoke & gasses out of the area, etc. These are generalities, and while every dept is different, these concepts are probably widely used. And I would agree with one of the other fellas that said most solar systems don't have the storage systems right now, and they are tied to the grid.
Holy shit - does anyone read the industry magazines or take classes?If a fire dept is "spraying water" on a roof without solar panels, generally that means the bldg is lost and firefighters are in defensive operations. We wouldn't put water on solar panels because there is no way to turn them off, unless you cover all of them, as the photo receptors are "always on" if they receive light. I imagine everyone can agree that water & electricity is bad juju. Vertical ventilation is done by cutting holes in roofs to allow smoke/gases/heat out while fire suppression is done by putting water one the fire inside (generally). If we're unable to vent vertically because of obstructions or other hazards, horizontal ventilation is done by taking out the windows on the upper floors, closing doors to areas not involved, using hydraulic ventilation by spraying fog streams out the window to pull smoke & gasses out of the area, etc. These are generalities, and while every dept is different, these concepts are probably widely used. And I would agree with one of the other fellas that said most solar systems don't have the storage systems right now, and they are tied to the grid.
Dude - it seems this subject is squarely in the area of gun shop legal advice.I'm sure you know way more about this subject than I ever will; you sound like you're connected to the fire dept.
Our recently installed system, the town permits required firefighter paths on the roofs, and we had three roofs covered in panels. They are grid-tied but shut down when the grid goes down. We were required to have rapid shutdown on the outside of the house for firefighters, and we have micro converters on each panel, so the only flow left would be the small enclosed connection to the panel and its matching micro converter. AC is safer than DC, so the conversion is done at source.
Again, you know way more than me about panel water, and I'm sure you are referencing a high-pressure hose, but the panels are exposed to the elements and get rain and snow on them.
Fingers crossed, we never have to find out.
I'm an Engineer; in fact, I'm a Senior Engineer. Does that make me a Senior idiot?Dude - it seems this subject is squarely in the area of gun shop legal advice.
The guys that design, build and certified the safety systems required by both electrical and fire safety code are idiots like all Engineers so even though the installers demonstrate the safety system as part of the sell-off, it really doesn't actually work...
I'm a government engineer that's idiot^3 level at least.I'm an Engineer; in fact, I'm a Senior Engineer. Does that make me a Senior idiot?