None of what you just said rebuts my point about the NRA doing little to nothing in Massachusetts. I totally agree that on a national basis, the NRA is the most effective 2A organization in existance but as a gun owner in Massachusetts, national laws are currently low on my list of problems.
Where was the NRA when Romney signed the MA AWB? Where was the NRA when the AG regs went into effect? Where was the NRA over the last two years when various new gun control measures have been floated as bills in MA?
I also don't see how these complaints about the NRA divide MA gun owners into multiple camps. As I said, I'm an NRA member. However, due to their inaction here, my best course of action is to funnel any extra money I have for this cause towards GOAL instead of the NRA. Most people on this board would rather their tax money be kept local as much as possible. To me, it's the same with the NRA and GOAL.
It was mentioned earlier in this thread that the NRA is getting involved in the recent machine gun bill so I'll start to reconsider this position. That's a very recent development though so I'm not changing yet.
MA may well be a lost cause but as I mentioned, we can't be anymore of a lost cause than Chicago or DC yet the NRA is involved in those places. They need to show some more attention here too.
Where was the NRA when Romney signed the MA AWB? Where was the NRA when the AG regs went into effect? Where was the NRA over the last two years when various new gun control measures have been floated as bills in MA?
I also don't see how these complaints about the NRA divide MA gun owners into multiple camps. As I said, I'm an NRA member. However, due to their inaction here, my best course of action is to funnel any extra money I have for this cause towards GOAL instead of the NRA. Most people on this board would rather their tax money be kept local as much as possible. To me, it's the same with the NRA and GOAL.
It was mentioned earlier in this thread that the NRA is getting involved in the recent machine gun bill so I'll start to reconsider this position. That's a very recent development though so I'm not changing yet.
MA may well be a lost cause but as I mentioned, we can't be anymore of a lost cause than Chicago or DC yet the NRA is involved in those places. They need to show some more attention here too.
Lynne and a few others seem to understand.
Basically the more we divide ourselves into different camps, the less united front we present towards the anti-gun crowd who seem very willing to ignore their differences in order to achieve their goal of no guns for you and me.
Whatever the NRA did some 80-odd years ago when no one really anticipated todays push for total gun control is old news. Period. The NRA of today seems to understand and works for us on a broad front of activities that GOA, JPFO, CCRKBA, SAF, and just about all others simply cannot match.
Unfortunately the NRA also has their share of people who don't get it, but that is one of the costs of representing all gun owners. I'll bet GOA cannot even begin to reach the audience which the NRA reaches by being America's gun organization.
So complain away. The rest of us will continue to carry the water for those who will continue to find things to complain about rather than things to support.