Coda
NES Member
That is not bad at all. If you keep up on the undercoating you have nothing to worry about.Lol. Yup. Lots o rust. Hopefully it’s slows it up a bit with this stuff.
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Be sure to enter the NES/Pioneer Valley Arms April Giveaway ***Smith & Wesson SD9VE 9MM***
That is not bad at all. If you keep up on the undercoating you have nothing to worry about.Lol. Yup. Lots o rust. Hopefully it’s slows it up a bit with this stuff.
Agreed. I should have started in 2019 when I got the truck. Water under the bridge and all.That is not bad at all. If you keep up on the undercoating you have nothing to worry about.
Not necessary. Fluid Film creeps. I have sprayed it in the lower rust proofing holes of my door. Then I needed to pull the interior panel to work on a speaker and it had defied gravity and crept upwards!!!for $325 I guess thats what you get, I would want the tire dropped , those wheelwell liners removed and even pop out the head light and tail light assemblies the cost will go up for all that though. In the end if your happy thats all that matters
Right, but rust around the tail lights is really not a major concern. It is the structural things that I am keeping up on. If silt and crap can get in there, then Fluid Film can also.I used to pull the tail lights out of my 2013 every spring for the big spring rinse. I was always amazed how much silt and crap got up there.
Yup, it is called "planed longevity"The sad thing is that we can do better but it’s not as profitable.
Right, but rust around the tail lights is really not a major concern..
That’s not why I did it. On my 2013 it allowed unimpeded access to the full length of the interior of the bedside to hose it out. I was always surprised at how much sand and silt was on the driveway after the big spring flush.
It will be interesting to see how the aluminum body on my Super Duty holds up.
Bob
Not sure about Woolwax/NH Oil, but Fluid Film is like paste out of the can. You need to warm it up just to pour it. I don't think an airless would cut it even with a large nozzle.I have been thinking about using a airless paint sprayer to apply the Woolwax/NH oil. I have my eye on one from harbor freight. Has anyone else used an airless sprayer, if so what nozzle did they use?
This is the way to go, yes you need to crank the PSI up, 40psi isn't going to cut it.Not sure about Woolwax/NH Oil, but Fluid Film is like paste out of the can. You need to warm it up just to pour it. I don't think an airless would cut it even with a large nozzle.
I got this setup that is designed to spray fluid film. It works good but to get good volume I still have to crank my compressor up to around 100psi.
I like the (2) wands. One is a straight pattern and the other has holes on the sides (4 @ 90 degrees OC). So that works great for inside frame holes or door bottom drain holes.
View attachment 753571
I have a woolwax setup and it's basically the sameNot sure about Woolwax/NH Oil, but Fluid Film is like paste out of the can. You need to warm it up just to pour it. I don't think an airless would cut it even with a large nozzle.
I got this setup that is designed to spray fluid film. It works good but to get good volume I still have to crank my compressor up to around 100psi.
I like the (2) wands. One is a straight pattern and the other has holes on the sides (4 @ 90 degrees OC). So that works great for inside frame holes or door bottom drain holes.
View attachment 753571
Not sure about Woolwax/NH Oil, but Fluid Film is like paste out of the can. You need to warm it up just to pour it. I don't think an airless would cut it even with a large nozzle.
I got this setup that is designed to spray fluid film. It works good but to get good volume I still have to crank my compressor up to around 100psi.
I like the (2) wands. One is a straight pattern and the other has holes on the sides (4 @ 90 degrees OC). So that works great for inside frame holes or door bottom drain holes.
View attachment 753571
Autobody work after the fact has got to suck.What do mechanics think of these undercoatings? I can’t even imagine working on a vehicle with an undercoat that dries hard. It’s bad enough trying to chase leaks with the fluid varieties.
I don’t know, undercoat is great at hiding bad weldsAutobody work after the fact has got to suck.
I would rather do body work on steel that isn't rotted, it's easier to fix dents than it is rot. Same with mechanical work, I prefer when nuts and bolts can be removed vs being cut with the blue wrench.Autobody work after the fact has got to suck.
Tis' the season & I'm thinking of corrosion. Any recommendations on reasonable Wool-wax or NH oil type (non-rubberized)Undercoating on the North Shore or up to NH seacoast?
I realize there is a distributor map & search function looking for recommendations with recent first hand experience
I use this and fluid film kinda interchangeably. Whatever I can find at the store.This stuff works great! Went back and got more. View attachment 672218
I agree, ive noticed the same thing......the blaster is a better product, there is actual petroleum stuff in it that it doesn't wash away like FF.I used fluid film one year, on all 3 vehicles, after a couple months, it looked like I did not even apply it.
What I am saying is, this blaster surface shield stays on and looks like I applied it yesterday, even after a full year of driving.
I use fluid film yearly and I apply it every October and I can honestly say my frame looks to be in excellent condition. 2015 SierraI used fluid film one year, on all 3 vehicles, after a couple months, it looked like I did not even apply it.
What I am saying is, this blaster surface shield stays on and looks like I applied it yesterday, even after a full year of driving.