Speer used to make a #4 buck Lawman round but seems to have discontinued it.
Federal also used to make a #1 flight control.
If you enjoy the forum please consider supporting it by signing up for a NES Membership The benefits pay for the membership many times over.
Speer used to make a #4 buck Lawman round but seems to have discontinued it.
I can run them in a pump with a little rubber thing called OPSOL.Anyone have any experience with the shorty buckshot shells? Something like this
Buy Shorty Shells 12 Gauge Ammo 4 Buck | SH129 4B
Shopping for the Shorty Shells - Learn more about the latest Shorty Shotshell and other hunting or shooting gear at Federal Ammunition.www.federalpremium.com
Just don't load more than 5+1 in a semi.
Well done, but looks like there was an extra large shot in one of those loads? LOL that's a slug hole, correct?At defense distance, it really doesn't matter what 00 buck you use. This is what's in mine. Whichever ammo you end up deciding on, be sure to pattern it to know its characteristics in YOUR shotgun. View attachment 936935
Well done, but looks like there was an extra large shot in one of those loads? LOL that's a slug hole, correct?
Aha, obviously missed that. You can see where the plastic left marks. LOL I'll blame lack of sleep.Wad?
Got a picture of that Hornady box?This thread have me an excuse to hit the range this morning.
Hornady 24 pellet #4 buck: covers the whole silhouette at 15 yards; loses several pellets at 25 yards.
Federal Flitecontrol 9 pellet 00 buck: fist size hole at 15 yards; stays on the head at 25 yards; all pellets accounted for on the silhouette at *65* yards.
Not even going to bother shooting Rio #4 buckshot today: I've patterned it before and I was losing pellets at 10 yards.
Take from this what you will.
This thread have me an excuse to hit the range this morning.
Hornady 24 pellet #4 buck: covers the whole silhouette at 15 yards; loses several pellets at 25 yards.
Federal Flitecontrol 9 pellet 00 buck: fist size hole at 15 yards; stays on the head at 25 yards; all pellets accounted for on the silhouette at *65* yards.
Not even going to bother shooting Rio #4 buckshot today: I've patterned it before and I was losing pellets at 10 yards.
Take from this what you will.
It's this:Got a picture to that Hornady box?
Didn't shoot any other 00.Thanks. Yeah, flight control is a game change for longer range shots. Did you happen to shoot any other non-flight control 00 buck? I expect #4 to spread a bit more than 00.
Don’t you think shooting him with weak loads might piss him off enough to keep shooting at you?I didn't read the whole thread, but I doubt it matters.
Home invaders are cowards who are looking for the softest target they can find. Return fire will drive them away nine times out of ten, meaning I doubt it matters what that return fire is. If I'm at the top of the stairs sending ordnance their way, it's a very rare crook who'll continue toward me regardless of whether I'm sending buck or bird. Or .22 LR, come to that.
I'd go with whatever's easiest to patch in my walls. I'm perfectly okay with not killing the guy. He's never going to make another try at my house. So, from my perspective, the problem is solved.
What, have you forgotten the last two elements of the golden triad? (SSS)I didn't read the whole thread, but I doubt it matters.
Home invaders are cowards who are looking for the softest target they can find. Return fire will drive them away nine times out of ten, meaning I doubt it matters what that return fire is. If I'm at the top of the stairs sending ordnance their way, it's a very rare crook who'll continue toward me regardless of whether I'm sending buck or bird. Or .22 LR, come to that.
I'd go with whatever's easiest to patch in my walls. I'm perfectly okay with not killing the guy. He's never going to make another try at my house. So, from my perspective, the problem is solved.
Some older kids once purposefully shot me in the leg with a Crosman .177 pump pellet rifle. All that did was make me run home to load up my Sheridan 20 cal pump rifle and grab an entire box of pellets. Unfortunately Dad caught me before I could return to the OK Corral. 22's and birdshot can be in the piss them off category, though I agree most will hit the tracks at the sight or sound of a gun.Don’t you think shooting him with weak loads might piss him off enough to keep shooting at you?
Don’t you think shooting him with weak loads might piss him off enough to keep shooting at you?
Your body is made up of how much water? Yes! Absolutely hydrostatic shock.Do more research. No, seriously, this is such a ridiculous statement... Hydrostatic shock from birdshot
Again, we’re talking about home defense distances. The mass of shot will remain cohesive within that distance.1. Unless you dumped wax in the load, you need to consider each shot separately, not their combined mass. Each pellet is separately hitting the target and needs to be separately calculated for penetration. Mass, velocity, and diameter/sectional density all need to be considered for each individual pellet.
2. Hydrostatic shock isn’t a thing. When bullets transfer energy into tissue, they do create temporary cavities as the tissue stretches. Whether any of that cavity does damage or becomes permanent depends on whether that particular tissue’s elastic limit has been exceeded. This limit can be lowered through lacerations caused by fragmentation. And the more energy transferred, the bigger the temporary cavity. But most tissues can take a lot of stretch.
Edit: words
It is not cohesive in the casing. It is not cohesive when it leaves the barrel. It is not cohesive when it strikes the targetAgain, we’re talking about home defense distances. The mass of shot will remain cohesive within that distance.
At what distance will your next lethal encounter be at? Please tell us.Again, we’re talking about home defense distances. The mass of shot will remain cohesive within that distance.
Again, we’re talking about home defense distances. The mass of shot will remain cohesive within that distance.
I think we’re splitting hairs at this point. While a shotgun isn’t my go to for home defense, I still say birdshot is viable inside the home. For the record, I don’t see a line of people volunteering to stand in front of it.It is not cohesive in the casing. It is not cohesive when it leaves the barrel. It is not cohesive when it strikes the target
That's... not how that works. You need velocity for hydrostatic shock - rifle velocity.Your body is made up of how much water? Yes! Absolutely hydrostatic shock.
Do more researchI think we’re splitting hairs at this point. While a shotgun isn’t my go to for home defense, I still say birdshot is viable inside the home. For the record, I don’t see a line of people volunteering to stand in front of it.
Your last comment about my “next lethal encounter” isn’t from a guy who simply disagrees with me. It’s a weak ass flex.
Now, @PappyM3 has the class to make a counter argument, back it up, and maybe change a few minds.
I swear to God, this cracks me up every time you say it. You’re obtuse and rude but this is funny.Do more research
It’s more polite than saying “you’re wrong” which of course, you are.I swear to God, this cracks me up every time you say it. You’re obtuse and rude but this is funny.
I’ll have to disagree there too. We’re Americans. You have the right to be wrong. I tell our town’s democrats that all the time.It’s more polite than saying “you’re wrong” which of course, you are.
Do more reaearch.I’ll have to disagree there too. We’re Americans. You have the right to be wrong. I tell our town’s democrats that all the time.
Nice try but it’s losing its punch. Kinda beating a dead horse now.Do more reaearch.